Subject:
|
Re: Bi*nicle folks went away?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.technic
|
Date:
|
Fri, 15 Mar 2002 11:59:09 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1021 times
|
| |
|
|
On Fri, 15 Mar 2002 07:15:39 GMT, "William Howard"
<william@howard-family.fsworld.co.uk> wrote:
> > It seems like there have been that many posts about 'erroded' axles in the
> > last 72 hours. ;)
>
> And don't forget the very, very meaningful debate about what MOTM should be
> called! Think that one got 72 per hour at one point.
That was meaningful to me, I got my name.
The useless flame-war if Tim was right or not was a pity though since
both him and I had agreed already. AND PLEASE DON'T BRING THIS
DISCUSSION BACK TO LIFE AGAIN :)))
> Discussion is healthy, its what sets us apart from the apes (or should that
> be Rahi?)
>
> William
>
>
>
/Tobbe
http://www.arnesson.nu/lotek/
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | RE: Bi*nicle folks went away?
|
| (...) And don't forget the very, very meaningful debate about what MOTM should be called! Think that one got 72 per hour at one point. Discussion is healthy, its what sets us apart from the apes (or should that be Rahi?) William (22 years ago, 15-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
44 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
