To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 6696
6695  |  6697
Subject: 
Re: When is a website "independent" and when is it "part of"?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Sun, 22 Oct 2000 18:09:07 GMT
Viewed: 
500 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
it's not the US role to be the world's
policeman, but I digress).

That was a throwaway comment and I didn't expect a debate, but since you're
slagging the US, here I am.

Not a "slag", and to just the USA.


I'd say the UN is/should be the world's policeman. What the US (and others)
do independent of the UN is political mumbo jumbo all based on selfish gain.

Not sure I agree that everything the US does externally is for the benefit of
the US. I think it *should* be, but it isn't.

Take what is happening in the middle-east right now. If the US were to
withdraw some of its dogmatic support for Israel - it would have ended
days/weeks/years ago.

With the total destruction of Israel, right? I mean, isn't that what the hard
line states (and Yassir) want? For Israel to be gone, wiped off and the
territory replaced with a new state (not a Palestinian state, mind you...
that's Jordan).

I'm not sure that is true.

I will not debate the validity of the claim, per se. I think
it may very well have some validity though... what the British Empire did in
old Palestine by partitioning it into new Palestine (Jordan) and Israel, then
walking away and leaving everyone to fight it out, left things a total mess,
which is the usual result of UK meddling in borders. I could cite a half dozen
examples.

That was years ago. I'm not pround of. It is in the past.


While you're busily condemning the US for trying to influence affairs you
might want to make sure that the UK colonial record is clean first. It's not.
The US was a colonial power, briefly, mostly by accident, but has a pretty
good record (our biggest colony being the Phillipines, and we did fairly well
at running that second hand colony and fairy well at transitioning it).

...and what about all the murderous dictators uncle sam (and the
other "western" nations) supported during the cold war at the expense of
democracy?

...and take a look at the way minorities were treated in some parts of their
own country during the same era - I'm talking about the USA here.



Scott A


The UK
has a long bloody record of repression as a colonial power and a terrible
record at stopping and leaving stable governments behind.

Iraq-Kuwait
India to India-Pakistan
Pakistan to Pakistan-Bengladesh
Palestine to Israel-Jordan
Ireland to Ireland-Northern Ireland
The Tamil Tigers
Rhodesia
South Africa

All caused by fools somewhere in London drawing lines on maps.

*DO* I need to go on?

Note that the vaunted french screwed up as badly, or worse, in Indochina.

++Lar



Message has 3 Replies:
  Re: When is a website "independent" and when is it "part of"?
 
(...) It is though. That's exactly what they want. (As for what you said in reply to my post - well heck, Larry didn't intend this to be a debate about the US either, right? He was just proving a point. You argued it's not true. He said it and he's (...) (24 years ago, 22-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: When is a website "independent" and when is it "part of"?
 
(...) why not? Jordan's population is 90% palestinian. The only thing stopping it from being a palestinian state is that the palestinians are not the ones running that country. So why is it not true? Dan (24 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: When is a website "independent" and when is it "part of"?
 
"Scott A" <s.arthur@hw.ac.uk> wrote in message news:G2uFr7.BxA@lugnet.com... (...) you're (...) This should have been "Not a "slag", and not just the USA." (24 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: When is a website "independent" and when is it "part of"?
 
(...) That was a throwaway comment and I didn't expect a debate, but since you're slagging the US, here I am. (...) Not sure I agree that everything the US does externally is for the benefit of the US. I think it *should* be, but it isn't. (...) (...) (24 years ago, 22-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

58 Messages in This Thread:























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR