Subject:
|
Re: Possible deep deep spoiler.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Wed, 22 May 2002 15:26:57 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
489 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.starwars, Felix Greco writes:
> One question and then I'll go back to lurking mode. Why do the Jedi look at
> "balancing of the force" as a good thing? In EpI & II, Mace Windu kind of
> refers to Anikin as though he's some type of prophesized mesiah figure. Its
> just not clicking for me. If Yoda and Mace are discussing in Ep I that the
> Sith were extinct, what the heck did they think balance was going to be.
> And if one of the Skywalkers does bring balance to the force, isn't that a
> bad thing? Doesn't that imply a massive rise in the dark side?
>
> Help me out.
Like someone else has mentioned elsewhere in the thread, I don't necessarily
think that the concept of "balance of the force" means an equal number of dark
side and light side Jedi.
I'm not entirely sure WHAT they mean when they say it, but they seem to be bent
on destroying the Sith while accepting the idea of this "balance", so clearly
they don't think that increasing the numbers of Sith- or in fact having any
Sith around at all- is a good thing.
My pure speculation is that it has something to do with finding someone who can
use the Force while remaining in touch with his own emotions- but not giving in
to them entirely, like the Sith do.
eric
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Possible deep deep spoiler.
|
| One question and then I'll go back to lurking mode. Why do the Jedi look at "balancing of the force" as a good thing? In EpI & II, Mace Windu kind of refers to Anikin as though he's some type of prophesized mesiah figure. Its just not clicking for (...) (23 years ago, 22-May-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
27 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
