Subject:
|
Re: Cheshire LEGOFest pictures
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Wed, 7 Mar 2001 12:18:29 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1231 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.robotics, Jennifer Clark writes:
> Steve Baker wrote:
>
> > Now if it had a reverse path to send sensor data back to the computer, you'd
> > *really* have something. Without some way to read back sensors though, the
> > ability to control motors using the computer is a LOT less useful than you
> > might think.
>
> Tell me about it! I've had to program real systems (as opposed to real lego
> systems :-) with no feedback at various points in the past, and it can indeed • be
> horrific.
>
> However, I believe John may have something up his sleeve with regard to • exactly
> this matter. But I have said enough - time for him to comment I think :-)
>
> Jennifer Clark
Oh man... have another brick transmitting the input of 8 sensors back to the
computer and you've definitely beat the RCX to a pulp!!
- David
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Cheshire LEGOFest pictures
|
| (...) Tell me about it! I've had to program real systems (as opposed to real lego systems :-) with no feedback at various points in the past, and it can indeed be horrific. However, I believe John may have something up his sleeve with regard to (...) (24 years ago, 7-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
48 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Robotics
|
|
|
|
|
|
