Subject:
|
Re: Cheshire LEGOFest pictures
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Wed, 7 Mar 2001 11:47:05 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
992 times
|
| |
|
|
Steve Baker wrote:
> Now if it had a reverse path to send sensor data back to the computer, you'd
> *really* have something. Without some way to read back sensors though, the
> ability to control motors using the computer is a LOT less useful than you
> might think.
Tell me about it! I've had to program real systems (as opposed to real lego
systems :-) with no feedback at various points in the past, and it can indeed be
horrific.
However, I believe John may have something up his sleeve with regard to exactly
this matter. But I have said enough - time for him to comment I think :-)
Jennifer Clark
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Cheshire LEGOFest pictures
|
| (...) be (...) exactly (...) Oh man... have another brick transmitting the input of 8 sensors back to the computer and you've definitely beat the RCX to a pulp!! - David (23 years ago, 7-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Cheshire LEGOFest pictures
|
| (...) Now if it had a reverse path to send sensor data back to the computer, you'd *really* have something. Without some way to read back sensors though, the ability to control motors using the computer is a LOT less useful than you might think. (23 years ago, 7-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
48 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
