To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.org.ca.rtltorontoOpen lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Organizations / Canada / rtlToronto / 3874
3873  |  3875
Subject: 
Re: lube experiment
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
Date: 
Sun, 3 Mar 2002 15:51:09 GMT
Viewed: 
677 times
  
I wasn't going to reply to this thread anymore. I wasn't going to reply to
this thread anymore. I wasn't going to reply to this thread anymore.

"Calum Tsang" <tsangc@mie.utoronto.ca> wrote in message
news:GsEKyz.9C3@lugnet.com...

I invite you to try a REAL test if you want to prove any difference in
performance-ie, a larger complex of gears, something other than Vaseline.

Why something other than Vaseline? It's a fantastic lubricant (and I should
know!*). What are you going to replace it with, something gooey, and keep
changing it until you can point and stand and jump around and clap
"SEE?????? SEE??????????????? IT *DOES* ENHANCE YOUR PERFORMANCE!!!!!!!!
HAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!"?

It simply *will not make* that much of a difference! Why is this an issue!
Why am I wasting my time on this!

    Iain

*-What!



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: lube experiment
 
(...) It doesn't prove anything, Chris. I have two objections to your "test": -Worm to 24t is a very simple gear mechanism. You know as well as I do that friction doesn't build up with only two gears. -The viscosity of the Vaseline probably causes (...) (23 years ago, 3-Mar-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

42 Messages in This Thread:















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR