 | | Buddhism
|
|
I'll adopt Ben’s Zen state-of-mind to answer this question: (...) And illusion? Perhaps… But if the group collectively embraces it, it becomes our reality. And in this organization we dictate the state of the matrix. Therefore, if we should so (...) (23 years ago, 16-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general
|
|
(...) Here's one 8?) ROSCO (23 years ago, 16-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general
|
|
(...) It displays all groups to which the message will be posted in the authorisation mail. They're above the actual message, on a line titled "Newsgroups" (...) They're already there, as well. Right up the top. Though many people (including myself, (...) (23 years ago, 16-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general
|
|
(...) Richard: In some ways, yes, but I see your point and it is a valid one. I'm glad SOMEONE is defending free speech, even though the TOS is clearly stated. I also had a good chuckle-you're a funny guy, I liked your immediate response to Tim :) (...) (23 years ago, 16-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | return to Zen on rtl Toronto
|
|
oh well, let's get to the subjects at hand..... we (as a local lego group) have to busily prepare for the next two events... Train 3, which is just over 1/2 a week away..... and Robotics 10.... that should keep everyone busy.... so let's get back to (...) (23 years ago, 16-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general
|
|
(...) Because of the web interface, what you or anyone else say in "your" NG is hardly private. Many if not most view any post no matter which NG it's in. You may think you "get away" with stuff, but that's only an illusion. -John (23 years ago, 16-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general
|
|
(...) Sorry, Richard. I cant speak for Calum. I can speak for me. I personally was not going to wade into this BUT you did bring up my name. I was not/ am not hanging my head in shame. What happened, happened. It was unfortunate that Iain, did not (...) (23 years ago, 16-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general
|
|
(...) That’s –EXACTLY- how I felt! Why’d Tim have to ‘Five-O’ u on such a minor statement? He could of just ignored it and let it pass. (It’s not like the whole newsgroup was about to be spammed by ‘lewd-anagrams!’) This just totally wastes Suz’ (...) (23 years ago, 16-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: faster than a 48x CD re-writer
|
|
(...) HA, Dave, that's GREAT news. congratulations!!!! :) Of course as you have stated we both have LOTS of time to make the robot faster. I've got a few more timing tricks up my sleeve to try to speed things up. I've been in discussion with a few (...) (23 years ago, 15-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general
|
|
(...) hey Bro, all you had to do was remove the lugnet.general newsgroup from your posting....that would have saved everyone from trouble... Ben (23 years ago, 15-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: venting...
|
|
(...) I agree what you were saying, but it was Richard who posted it to Lugnet.General so Iain was the one who posted there... however, there have been other violations on Lugnet that seem to go unnoticed or whatever....what Iain said might have (...) (23 years ago, 15-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general
|
|
"Benjamin Medinets" <bmedinets@excite.com> wrote in message news:Gpytpv.I35@lugnet.com... (...) community... (...) as (...) How was I suposed to know someone felt it necissary to tattle to .general.admin? Iain (23 years ago, 15-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | venting...
|
|
K, i really was going to leave this alone... /rant on But now I notice (I'm not that LUGNet savvy, see, only subscribing to rtlTotonto and sometimes check out what's doin' in Trains...) that the progression of events thus far... Iain says something (...) (23 years ago, 15-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: faster than a 48x CD re-writer
|
|
(...) See, I was going for the 'Iain, you know...' thing where you try to imply with your words that 'I understand how you feel being shut down like that, you know maybe you slipped up with that post but, hey, we all make mistakes and it ain't the (...) (23 years ago, 15-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Blue shutter clip?
|
|
(...) You should have asked before last night... :( I'll have pics up of my LEGO mass exodus to the local Christian school later on my web page. They are borrowing my collection for the next 5-6 weeks. I kept what I need at home for the robot and (...) (23 years ago, 15-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Blue shutter clip?
|
|
(...) Hey Calum, I may have some..... I will have to check when I'm at home though..... Jeff VW (23 years ago, 15-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: faster than a 48x CD re-writer
|
|
(...) I don't think "moderators" is the correct term. That implies some form of official responsibility. Self appointed community police* is a better way to put it. Unless something has changed in Lugnet Administration, the only moderators I (...) (23 years ago, 15-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: faster than a 48x CD re-writer
|
|
(...) Bringing this newsgroup back to the important stuff... (moderators checking in on li'l ol' us: ye-ouch! I still appreciate you Iain, and the lewdness of your anagrams, inappropriate tho they may be, wasn't your point--you have no embarassment, (...) (23 years ago, 15-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | whats the latest for BrickWARZ??
|
|
this is mainly to Richard..... any thoughts on the toronto castle get-together in the (either near or distant) future?? In February, I will most likely submit the order for the 10 copies of the guarded inn, along with a purchase of 3 more knights (...) (23 years ago, 15-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | train3 details
|
|
To Calum and all... sorry for not submitting a proposed layout, but I don't think my contribution won't be as substantial this time.... that's the bad news... :( the good news is for this show, no pink Lego!! that's right Jeff VW....none!!! maybe (...) (23 years ago, 15-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
