To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.geekOpen lugnet.off-topic.geek in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Geek / 1446
1445  |  1447
Subject: 
Re: so-called "deep-linking" ruled okay
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.publish
Date: 
Thu, 30 Mar 2000 19:08:44 GMT
Highlighted: 
(details)
Viewed: 
1491 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.geek, Jacob Sparre Andersen writes:
Matthew:
Well, I for one am glad to see this:
<http://www.usatoday.com/life/cyber/tech/cth632.htm>.
While it may be impolite, linking to something deep within a website is not
illegal.

Why do you write that it may be impolite to link directly to a page?

Because it might actually be impolite!  :)

(Matthew didn't say that it was -always- impolte.)

I can think of a several cases where it would be (IMHO) impolite to the owner
of the site:

1.  Where the site specifically asks for it not to occur.
    (Very impolite to deep-link in this case.)

2.  Where the site uses frames, and deep linking makes it harder for the user
    to experience the site as it was intended, once they're done with that
    page, for better or for worse.
    (Slightly impolite to deep-link in this case.  Less impolite if you also
    give the user a top-level link.)

3.  The case BenR mentioned in another post -- where someone has "click Agree"
    pages.  If these are static HTML pages, these are easily bypassed, but I'm
    sure the author (albeit perhaps naive) of those webpages didn't intend for
    people to deep-link.
    (Incredibly impolite to deep-link in this case.)

4.  Where the website you're linking to has a splash page with a "click to
    Enter" screen.
    (Very impolite to deep-link in this case.)

Again, only IMHO.  :)


I find it most impolite _not_ to link directly to the relevant page.

I find it helpful as a user of that page with links, but that's a completely
separate issue.  By deep-linking, you're being more polite to the user while
possibly being less polite to the owner of the site you're deep-linking into.

--Todd



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: so-called "deep-linking" ruled okay
 
(...) A clarification on this one: usually the point of such pages is to preload data for following pages, or maybe to do some autodetection code and not worry about it later. So while linking past this may seem like you're doing people a favor, you (...) (25 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.publish)  

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: so-called "deep-linking" ruled okay
 
Matthew: (...) Nice to hear that the web can continue to work in the US too. Why do you write that it may be impolite to link directly to a page? I find it most impolite _not_ to link directly to the relevant page. Play well, Jacob ---...--- -- (...) (25 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)

20 Messages in This Thread:








Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR