Subject:
|
Re: so-called "deep-linking" ruled okay
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.geek
|
Date:
|
Fri, 31 Mar 2000 22:01:23 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
MATTDM@ihatespamMATTDM.ORG
|
Highlighted:
|
!
(details)
|
Viewed:
|
347 times
|
| |
| |
Jacob Sparre Andersen <sparre@cats.nbi.dk> wrote:
> The HTML construct with the FRAMESET and FRAME elements is a
> serious mistake that Netscape forced unto W3C even though it
> doesn't fit with the design of the web.
Yet for things like Quotes 'R' Us, it makes a lot of sense. Why reload the
entire page when all you want is a new quote?
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: so-called "deep-linking" ruled okay
|
| Dan: (...) The HTML construct with the FRAMESET and FRAME elements is a serious mistake that Netscape forced unto W3C even though it doesn't fit with the design of the web. (...) I don't feel the least bit bad about using peoples bandwidth, and I (...) (25 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
20 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|