Subject:
|
Re: so-called "deep-linking" ruled okay
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.geek
|
Date:
|
Fri, 31 Mar 2000 19:22:17 GMT
|
Highlighted:
|
(details)
|
Viewed:
|
155 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
In lugnet.off-topic.geek, Matthew Miller wrote:
> Jacob Sparre Andersen <sparre@sys-323.risoe.dk> wrote:
> > Why do you write that it may be impolite to link directly to
> > a page?
>
> Well, if you link directly to things deep within a site, you're not really
> respecting the user experience the site designer had in mind. That may or
> may not be impolite. (In fact, I'd argue that on a well designed site, it
> probably isn't.)
>
> What would you say about this:
>
> <http://www.mindling.com/sebnet/jumppage/>
>
> ?
>
> (Something I just noticed recently....)
Assuming they didn't ask your permission first, I'd say grabbing your
quotes is kinda rude. Except for the existence of your uncopyright
page, which pretty much allows anyone to do what they want. But still,
professional sites should have better standards.
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: so-called "deep-linking" ruled okay
|
| (...) Well, if you link directly to things deep within a site, you're not really respecting the user experience the site designer had in mind. That may or may not be impolite. (In fact, I'd argue that on a well designed site, it probably isn't.) (...) (24 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
20 Messages in This Thread: ![so-called "deep-linking" ruled okay -Matthew Miller (30-Mar-00 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: so-called "deep-linking" ruled okay -Todd Lehman (30-Mar-00 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: so-called "deep-linking" ruled okay -Jacob Sparre Andersen (30-Mar-00 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: so-called "deep-linking" ruled okay -Ben Roller (30-Mar-00 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: so-called "deep-linking" ruled okay -Jacob Sparre Andersen (30-Mar-00 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: so-called "deep-linking" ruled okay -Todd Lehman (30-Mar-00 to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.publish)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: so-called "deep-linking" ruled okay -Matthew Miller (31-Mar-00 to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.publish)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: so-called "deep-linking" ruled okay -Matthew Miller (31-Mar-00 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: so-called "deep-linking" ruled okay -Jacob Sparre Andersen (31-Mar-00 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: so-called "deep-linking" ruled okay -Dan Boger (31-Mar-00 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: so-called "deep-linking" ruled okay -Jacob Sparre Andersen (31-Mar-00 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: so-called "deep-linking" ruled okay -Dan Boger (31-Mar-00 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: so-called "deep-linking" ruled okay -Jacob Sparre Andersen (31-Mar-00 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: so-called "deep-linking" ruled okay -Dan Boger (31-Mar-00 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: so-called "deep-linking" ruled okay -Jacob Sparre Andersen (31-Mar-00 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: so-called "deep-linking" ruled okay -Matthew Miller (31-Mar-00 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: so-called "deep-linking" ruled okay -Larry Pieniazek (3-Apr-00 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: so-called "deep-linking" ruled okay -Jacob Sparre Andersen (3-Apr-00 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: so-called "deep-linking" ruled okay -Matthew Miller (31-Mar-00 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|