Subject:
|
Re: so-called "deep-linking" ruled okay
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.geek
|
Date:
|
Thu, 30 Mar 2000 16:19:08 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
425 times
|
| |
|
|
Matthew:
> Well, I for one am glad to see this:
> <http://www.usatoday.com/life/cyber/tech/cth632.htm>.
>
> While it may be impolite, linking to something deep within a website is not
> illegal.
Nice to hear that the web can continue to work in the US
too.
Why do you write that it may be impolite to link directly to
a page?
I find it most impolite _not_ to link directly to the
relevant page.
Play well,
Jacob
------------------------------------------------------------
-- E-mail: sparre@cats.nbi.dk --
-- Web...: <URL: http://hugin.ldraw.org/LEGO/Huse/ > --
------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
 | | Re: so-called "deep-linking" ruled okay
|
| (...) One reason is that it could possibly by-pass any relevant disclaimers that the owner of the web site puts on the front page. Are you still bound to the agreement made when you click "I agree" if you never see that page? Ben Roller (25 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | Re: so-called "deep-linking" ruled okay
|
| (...) Well, if you link directly to things deep within a site, you're not really respecting the user experience the site designer had in mind. That may or may not be impolite. (In fact, I'd argue that on a well designed site, it probably isn't.) (...) (25 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
Message is in Reply To:
20 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
