Subject:
|
Re: so-called "deep-linking" ruled okay
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.geek
|
Date:
|
Fri, 31 Mar 2000 17:50:22 GMT
|
Highlighted:
|
(details)
|
Viewed:
|
262 times
|
| |
|
|
Dan:
> In lugnet.off-topic.geek, Jacob Sparre Andersen writes:
> > > - it could be only one frame out of a complete frameset...
> >
> > That is a part of the error in the FRAME construction.
>
> how so? should I put in every page in every frameset a check to make sure I'm
> still within it? I'm not sure I understand what you mean here...
The HTML construct with the FRAMESET and FRAME elements is a
serious mistake that Netscape forced unto W3C even though it
doesn't fit with the design of the web.
> what about using up their bandwidth?
I don't feel the least bit bad about using peoples bandwidth,
and I would be using more of their bandwidth if I didn't link
directly to the relevant resource.
The whole idea with publishing something on the web is that
people should read it. If I link to a resource I just help
the publisher getting more readers (and I would actually
expect him to think that it is nice - even though I hear that
being /.'ed can be a bit hard).
> > Generally I try to keep people informed of which of their
> > resources I link to, but if people asked/forced me to only
> > link to their home page, I would probably remove all my
> > links to their site.
>
> I'm not saying it's never ok - in a lot of cases, deep linking is fine. But
> you can't always assume it's ok.
OK.
But until I see an example that demonstrates the opposite, I
will assume that deep linking always _is_ fine.
Jacob
--
.no.automatic.lugnet.sigs.yet
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
 | | Re: so-called "deep-linking" ruled okay
|
| (...) while true - at least then they get to generate revenue, or attract to the rest of the site. If you use pause DB pics in your ebay auction (for instance), you are abuseing the fact that the pics are up there. (...) people should read what you (...) (24 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | Re: so-called "deep-linking" ruled okay
|
| (...) Surely you don't mean this to be true in general, right? Else you are OK with spam, since, after all, it's just using up bandwidth, right? (...) But what if the publisher wants that particular resource to be presented in the fashion that the (...) (24 years ago, 3-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: so-called "deep-linking" ruled okay
|
| (...) how so? should I put in every page in every frameset a check to make sure I'm still within it? I'm not sure I understand what you mean here... (...) what about using up their bandwidth? (...) I'm not saying it's never ok - in a lot of cases, (...) (24 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
20 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
