Message has 2 Replies: ![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: so-called "deep-linking" ruled okay
|
| Matthew: (...) Nice to hear that the web can continue to work in the US too. Why do you write that it may be impolite to link directly to a page? I find it most impolite _not_ to link directly to the relevant page. Play well, Jacob ---...--- -- (...) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
20 Messages in This Thread: ![You are here](/news/here.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: so-called "deep-linking" ruled okay -Todd Lehman (30-Mar-00 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: so-called "deep-linking" ruled okay -Jacob Sparre Andersen (30-Mar-00 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: so-called "deep-linking" ruled okay -Ben Roller (30-Mar-00 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: so-called "deep-linking" ruled okay -Jacob Sparre Andersen (30-Mar-00 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: so-called "deep-linking" ruled okay -Todd Lehman (30-Mar-00 to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.publish)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: so-called "deep-linking" ruled okay -Matthew Miller (31-Mar-00 to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.publish)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: so-called "deep-linking" ruled okay -Matthew Miller (31-Mar-00 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: so-called "deep-linking" ruled okay -Jacob Sparre Andersen (31-Mar-00 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: so-called "deep-linking" ruled okay -Dan Boger (31-Mar-00 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: so-called "deep-linking" ruled okay -Jacob Sparre Andersen (31-Mar-00 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: so-called "deep-linking" ruled okay -Dan Boger (31-Mar-00 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: so-called "deep-linking" ruled okay -Jacob Sparre Andersen (31-Mar-00 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: so-called "deep-linking" ruled okay -Dan Boger (31-Mar-00 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: so-called "deep-linking" ruled okay -Jacob Sparre Andersen (31-Mar-00 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: so-called "deep-linking" ruled okay -Matthew Miller (31-Mar-00 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: so-called "deep-linking" ruled okay -Larry Pieniazek (3-Apr-00 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: so-called "deep-linking" ruled okay -Jacob Sparre Andersen (3-Apr-00 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: so-called "deep-linking" ruled okay -Matthew Miller (31-Mar-00 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: so-called "deep-linking" ruled okay -Steve Bliss (31-Mar-00 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|