Subject:
|
Re: so-called "deep-linking" ruled okay
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.geek
|
Date:
|
Thu, 30 Mar 2000 16:36:57 GMT
|
Highlighted:
|
(details)
|
Viewed:
|
182 times
|
| |
|
|
> > While it may be impolite, linking to something deep within a website is not
> > illegal.
> Why do you write that it may be impolite to link directly to
> a page?
One reason is that it could possibly by-pass any relevant disclaimers that the
owner of the web site puts on the front page. Are you still bound to the
agreement made when you click "I agree" if you never see that page?
Ben Roller
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: so-called "deep-linking" ruled okay
|
| Ben: (...) A website with "click agree pages" that can be bypassed by something as simple as a bookmark are defect, and nobody in their sane mind would ever admit having seen such a "click agree page". The world wide web works by URL's, and it is a (...) (25 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: so-called "deep-linking" ruled okay
|
| Matthew: (...) Nice to hear that the web can continue to work in the US too. Why do you write that it may be impolite to link directly to a page? I find it most impolite _not_ to link directly to the relevant page. Play well, Jacob ---...--- -- (...) (25 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
20 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
