Subject:
|
Re: so-called "deep-linking" ruled okay
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.geek
|
Date:
|
Fri, 31 Mar 2000 21:59:35 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
mattdm@mattdmSPAMLESS.org
|
Viewed:
|
213 times
|
| |
|
|
Dan Boger <dan@giccs.georgetown.edu> wrote:
> I think Matt was refering to the quote at the bottom, shamelessly stolen from
> quotes-r-us...
Less shamelessly now, btw -- the page maintainer has made a more obvious
credit to Q'R'U, and I'm okay with that if he is. (See:
<http://www.quotes-r-us.org/uncopyright.html>).
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: so-called "deep-linking" ruled okay
|
| (...) I think a web SITE is supposed to be able to stand alone... A page is just a part of it - it could be only one frame out of a complete frameset... (...) I think Matt was refering to the quote at the bottom, shamelessly stolen from (...) (24 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
20 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
