To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.geekOpen lugnet.off-topic.geek in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Geek / 1009
1008  |  1010
Subject: 
Re: Leap-seconds (was: Re: Leapyears (was Y2K problem with lugnet! (was Re: Help...)))
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.geek
Date: 
Wed, 5 Jan 2000 14:16:00 GMT
Viewed: 
1187 times
  
Nobody said they were or weren't! DEC was just saying that they chose
not to be a supplier.

at least not back in '83 :-)
nah, actually never did that I know of at any point afterwards either.

oh well, would have been a cool feature.

-S



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Leap-seconds (was: Re: Leapyears (was Y2K problem with lugnet! (was Re: Help...)))
 
(...) Come now, atomic clocks aren't that expensive. Probably you can get one for $10k or less. Surplus should be way cheaper. Jasper (25 years ago, 5-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)

40 Messages in This Thread:












Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR