Subject:
|
Re: Y2K bug in action
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.geek
|
Date:
|
Wed, 5 Jan 2000 14:08:54 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
(mattdm@mattdm)AvoidSpam(.org)
|
Viewed:
|
175 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
Steven Vore <svore@mindspring.com> wrote:
> <pouting>Hey, stop that decommissioning talk - that hurts.</pouting> :-)
Hey, look, you want it, you can have it. Comes with a buncha professors who
they think that it is the center of the computing universe. Which it
probably was, in 1970whenever-the-first-got-the-machine. (Hardware's been
upgraded several times since then; it's a 180Mhz alpha...)
Anyway, the problem isn't that it's a bad OS. (Although damn, it really
makes one type a lot more than Unix does.) It's that we've got no one with a
really good understanding of it, and outside help is becoming more and more
ridiculously expensive.
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
7 Messages in This Thread: ![Y2K bug in action -Matthew Miller (4-Jan-00 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Y2K bug in action -Will Middelaer (5-Jan-00 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Y2K bug in action -Jasper Janssen (6-Jan-00 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Y2K bug in action -Steven Vore (5-Jan-00 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Y2K bug in action -Larry Pieniazek (5-Jan-00 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Y2K bug in action -Matthew Miller (5-Jan-00 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|