To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 27206
27205  |  27207
Subject: 
Re: overreaction was Re: More random flaming
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Tue, 23 Aug 2005 15:52:26 GMT
Viewed: 
1521 times
  
Lenny,

I assume that by changing the title you see my post as random flaming. It is not at all random and nor is it flaming. You have irritated me with your holier-than-thou attitude and I have merely pointed out some of your character flaws.

  
   PS. Your dictation of what is valid and invalid humour based entirely on your own cultural prejudices borders on racism.

Am I not free to make my own judgement as to what I think is valid? Am I not free to express that judgement where I see fit? I don’t make any claim to be the absolute authority on what is or isn’t valid humor. I have expressed my opinions of Richie’s MOC as honestly as possible in a sincere attempt to help him grow as a builder through constructive criticism. I have never made a post with the intent to start a fight, on the contrary, I have tried to move past this issue and reach a resolution. Richie questioning my use of the word “sensitivity” is what brought this up again, in what I think is a very obvious move to bait me.

You can make whatever judgements you want to make. As can I. We seem to have a difference of opinion here though but since all our opinions are valid then I assume you will extend me the same courtesy you expect yourself and let me have them. Perhaps you’l extend that courtesy to everyone and let everyone have their own opinion without them requiring the Leonard Hoffman stamp of approval.

   And I wouldn’t be so bold with the use of “racism” if I were you. Establishing me as a racist just because you might not agree with all of my opinions is insulting and ignorant. Such extremist labeling is just as racist and bigotred as the racism you are accusing me of.

I don’t recall calling you a racist Lenny. In fact, I did not. I said some of your behaviour “bordered on racism” which is a whole lot different to saying you are a racist (meaning you regularly exhibit actual racist behaviour). And if you think that saying that is extremist, you have a very limited view of the world and I suggest you get out more. Perhaps read some newspapers too. Then you can find out what an extremist is.

You have accused me of racism AND bigotry which is more ‘extreme’ than what I said about you. I think that might be a little hypocritical don’t you? Squealing and complaining does not make your argument correct, nor does it make you intelligent, it just makes you look like a prima donna at best and a toddler at worst.

   If you have a problem with my cultural prejudices, please highlight them and refute them rather than simply calling them racist.

-Lenny

Why would I bother doing this. If I do it, you will ‘refute’ each one of them with your cunning logic and if I don’t you will say that there is nothing. Since neither gains me anything I will choose the path of least effort.

Tim



Message has 2 Replies:
  (canceled)
 
  Re: overreaction was Re: More random flaming
 
(...) Actually, I saw my post as random flaming. But I feel that my recent posts have been over the line, despite whatever good intentions I may have had, so I had them cancelled. Please take that as a sign of my regret for what I've said. -Lenny (19 years ago, 23-Aug-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  (canceled)
 

36 Messages in This Thread:












Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR