To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 27181
27180  |  27182
Subject: 
Re: Life size guns and assault rifles on Brickshellf-- opinions?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Mon, 22 Aug 2005 12:33:25 GMT
Viewed: 
1405 times
  
Allister,

I usually lurk, but the original post coupled with the recent trends out here begged for a satire. Of course there are holes in this position, the same holes Ondrew’s original has; let’s count them.

1) If I truly “don’t want to create a fuss,” then why am I posting in the first place?

2) What ideals does LEGO stand for, anyway? The freedom to build anything you want given sufficient pieces? The ability to randomly combine BURPs and Harry Potter staircases until it gets boring? Or merely the gradual collapse of a stated commitment to non-violent toys, one product cycle at a time?

3) Why drag Nazism into an apparently non-ideological issue? Every time I’ve seen it done online, it’s a blatant piece of melodrama.

4) If the posts in question conjure up such disturbing emotions, why am I even looking at them?

5) Is the last line’s resort to an improbable extreme another attempt at melodrama or a diversion from the weaknesses of the primary argument?

Ordinarily I wouldn’t have even bothered writing anything in the first place, but this quiet crusade to make LUGNET as child-safe as a DUPLO block is starting to feel like a slippery slope. First it’s an easy target like a flying swastika; now it’s life-size weapons, which I’d never even seen until Ondrew dug them up. If weapons are so horrible, it’s only a jump in scale before someone suggests knocking .military off the group list.

I guess I’m just getting tired of how negative this place has gotten lately. I have my share of negative opinions, of course, but I exercise some of that fabled self-restraint to avoid pointlessly annoying people. For example, I’d gladly can Bionicle (no pun intended) if it meant Town would be more than a juniorized construction crew each year building yet another police station, but I don’t link Bionicle MOCs to cluck my tongue at them. I wish the heads of TLG had the courage to drop the good-while-it-lasted Star Wars license and resurrect Space instead of adding a hundred pieces to a B-wing, but I don’t call them jackbooted thugs for not doing so.

Chris



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Life size guns and assault rifles on Brickshellf-- opinions?
 
(...) Chris, The comment about 'self censorship' wasn't directed at anyone in particular. It's between you and your conscience what you post - nothing to do with me. However I did spot the satire, and enjoyed it, even allowing for the somewhat (...) (19 years ago, 23-Aug-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Life size guns and assault rifles on Brickshellf-- opinions?
 
(...) O, I agree, more or less. As is oft repeated, (URL) "LUGNET does not censor">. I believe this also to be a worthy goal of it's members. However, in a civilised community, such as I believe we're trying to build here, a certain amount of (...) (19 years ago, 22-Aug-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

36 Messages in This Thread:












Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR