To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 23329
23328  |  23330
Subject: 
Re: This is where I actually want a gun
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Mon, 9 Feb 2004 03:51:45 GMT
Viewed: 
411 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
   In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
   In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys wrote:

   See, when the emotions get involved, can one really make a rational decision where life is concerned.

But if we are not outraged when atrocities occur, we are morally doomed.

And if we stoop to the level of the atrocity committer in our meting out of justice, we are also so doomed.

Of course, but even if we tortured and killed a known torturer and killer, it still wouldn’t be morally equivalent to the torturing and killing of an innocent.

And BTW, what IS justice for a known kidnapper and murderer of innocent children? Life in prison with 3 squares, cable TV, and conjugal visits? Somehow that doesn’t parse in my view.

  
  
   I don’t know what’s the right thing to do. If given a gun and this guy in a room, I’d kill him. But would that be Just? I dunno.

How would it be unjust? Showing him the same mercy he showed seems just to me. The injustice is that there is a family whose lives have been completely shattered forever and this puke is allowed to continue to exist.

Assuming he did it.

For the sake of the discussion, yes.

   I grant it looks pretty certain but never can you be 100% CERTAIN. Do you know for *sure* what exactly happened, John?

What is 100% certain, Lar? The law doesn’t even require that, because it would be impossible to convict anyone (as long as the criminals never admitted guilt).

  
   Again I admit that that would be human justice,

And therefore imperfect, and subject to error and mistakes and out and out malfeasance. There have been too many rushes to judgement, too many lynchings, too many cases where a convenient patsy was located... a drifter, a guy with a previous record, or whatever, and a confession beaten out of him so that the case can be closed all neat and tidy. Is that the case here?

Beaten out of him??? Please, you watch too much TV.

   Probably not but do you know for certain?

What’s with this certainty test? I think we all know that there are only two things certain in life;-)

   Therefore I oppose the death penalty even in this case.

Bad reason to oppose it in my view. So a few innocents are executed injustly (a very few, BTW). Compare that to the number of innocents who are murdered by murderers who get off on a technicality.

  
It is when the citizens decide to mete out JUSTICE on their own that things go awry.

Why, because our present system functions so well on its own?

JOHN



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: This is where I actually want a gun
 
(...) I see no reason for cable TV or conjugal visits. Life in prison sounds about right though. (I beleive you asked this already) Note, again, my assertion that prisons need to be structured so that they do not cost the state money, but rather, (...) (20 years ago, 9-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: This is where I actually want a gun
 
(...) And if we stoop to the level of the atrocity committer in our meting out of justice, we are also so doomed. (...) Assuming he did it. I grant it looks pretty certain but never can you be 100% CERTAIN. Do you know for *sure* what exactly (...) (20 years ago, 8-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

45 Messages in This Thread:














Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR