 | | Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California) —Richard Marchetti
|
| | | (...) I think I'm going to require more proof than your say so -- esp. when practically everything you communicate here is a deeply slanted, bigotted statement. As a matter of fact, I'd like an analysis of statements I have made and how they show me (...) (21 years ago, 21-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California) —Richard Marchetti
|
| | | | (...) As if on cue... American Jihad (URL) Recently NBC News broadcast footage of Army Lt. General William Boykin, a deputy undersecretary of defense, equating our campaigns in the Middle East to a religious war. Among his arguments: that Islam is (...) (21 years ago, 21-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California) —David Koudys
|
| | | | (...) <snip> (...) Scary, ain't it? K, all religious debate aside, what do we do when generals and political appointees believe their 'god given mandate'? At what point do the citizens actually shut this fiasco down? Dave K (21 years ago, 21-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California) —Richard Marchetti
|
| | | | (...) I'd like it shut down immediately. On the other side of things are people like John Neal. I think it would be fair to say that he and I are on completely opposite sides of this issue. And so far we haven't slipped completely into a (...) (21 years ago, 21-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California) —David Koudys
|
| | | | (...) This I do not know but you have an appointed president tlaking all 'christian values' and letting ownership of endangeded and wild species pass into the hands of the average joe (good legislation there) and started a 'military campaign on (...) (21 years ago, 21-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Iraq (was Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap) —Richard Marchetti
|
| | | | (...) See, this is the kind of cohesive backward and forward looking thinking that I don't see from you in other discussions, say about the gun issue. It's all well and good to pat ourselves on the back and say we overcame the witch trials, slavery, (...) (21 years ago, 21-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Iraq (was Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap) —David Koudys
|
| | | | (...) The cohesion is there. I think you're just blinded to it. It's an inherent factor in your culture--it's something I noticed when I was in Chicago last week. In one breath a guy I was in a meeting with spoke of 'socialism' as if it was dung on (...) (21 years ago, 21-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Iraq (was Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap) —Mike Petrucelli
|
| | | | (...) Crappy parents raise stupid kids. (...) Well throughout history we have yet to see a country prove otherwise. Oh wait, that's not proof?! (...) You know you still have not replied to (URL) this> -Mike Petrucelli (21 years ago, 21-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Iraq (was Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap) —David Koudys
|
| | | | | (...) You didn't say anything new in there at all, Mike. Lets have a looksee-- " Are you joking? “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” What (...) (21 years ago, 21-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Iraq (was Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap) —Mike Petrucelli
|
| | | | | | (...) Well, as Hop-Frog has pointed out numerous times, our founding fathers stated quite clearly when asked that a militia was anyone that is not a government offical. (...) Perhaps that is the modern day definition, but what does that have to do (...) (21 years ago, 21-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Iraq (was Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap) —Richard Marchetti
|
| | | | | | | (...) That's true, and more than once I went to great lengths to make the point crystal clear too, with lots of historical references: (URL) 2nd Amendment -- Bare Bones> And gee, that cite is not even that old...last year. I find it annoying when a (...) (21 years ago, 22-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Iraq (was Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap) —David Koudys
|
| | | | | | | | (...) It hasn't been amply settled. You are not a well regulated militia by any standard of those words. It's a point you consitently avoid--you and others cut right to the "the rights of the people to own guns shall not be infringed" Further, you (...) (21 years ago, 22-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Iraq (was Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap) —Richard Marchetti
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Did you even read that cite again? Read the whole 3 message thread please: **From Bouvier's Law Dictionary and Concise Encyclopedia: POSSE COMITATUS. These Latin words signify the power of the county. Or yet again in other words: the power of (...) (21 years ago, 22-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Iraq (was Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap) —David Koudys
|
| | | | | | | | (...) And we discussed this before--and you added addendums to the idea of "whole people" to not include those that are too young, old, infirm, or mentally unstable. Did you also stop to consider that, in context of the day and age, that "whole (...) (21 years ago, 22-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Iraq (was Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap) —Richard Marchetti
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Not at all. You would be 100% correct as to the meaning at the time of ratification. But collectively, the 13th and 14th Amendment gave freed slaves the status of Freemen. Knowing precisely what that meant, many freed slaves had to obtain guns (...) (21 years ago, 22-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Iraq (was Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap) —David Koudys
|
| | | | | | | | (...) This has nothing to do with morality. It has everything to do with your selective interpretation. Either the 2nd is archaic, for you do not supply militia members as needed from 'the people' anymore, the people who join the militia today are (...) (21 years ago, 22-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Iraq (was Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap) —Richard Marchetti
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) What does my opposition to a standing army have to do with the need, or right, to a militia? The militia is de facto -- it is the people themselves. There is no wiggling. I am not telling you that we are currently doing things in strict (...) (21 years ago, 22-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Iraq (was Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap) —Mike Petrucelli
|
| | | | | | | | (...) I agree if there were laws or even constitutional rights that caused the deaths of innocent life I would be all for removing them too. Of course removing the right of law abiding citizens to have weapons does not reduce the crime rate, even (...) (21 years ago, 23-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Iraq (was Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap) —David Koudys
|
| | | | | | (...) Not to really be flippant--so gov't officials aren't allowed to own guns? Any time I've heard of bills being presented to "regulate" the sales, distribution, or ownership of guns in your country, a huge furor erupts. Guns, or the use thereof, (...) (21 years ago, 22-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Iraq (was Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap) —Mike Petrucelli
|
| | | | | | (...) LOL. No they just are not considered part of the militia. (...) You do know that there are more Americans in formally declared militia groups than in the US Military right? (...) Yes but human nature has not. (...) I suppose we can both agree (...) (21 years ago, 22-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Iraq (was Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap) —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | | (...) Is that true? I don't dispute it, but I wasn't aware of it. If it's true, then what level of gov't official is included? Dave! (21 years ago, 22-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Iraq (was Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap) —Mike Petrucelli
|
| | | | | | | (...) Well I think it was more a tongue in cheek reply to a tongue in cheek question. It is based off of the statement by George Mason “I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials.” I would say that is (...) (21 years ago, 22-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Iraq (was Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap) —Richard Marchetti
|
| | | | | | (...) In the main, the militia merely means an armed group of freepersons that are not otherwise playing some kind of official role or duty. I mean, a sheriff might call together a posse comitatus and work closely with one -- but he remains the (...) (21 years ago, 22-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Iraq (was Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap) —David Koudys
|
| | | | | | (...) <snip> (...) Selective interpretation at it's finest! Now look who's disregarding the founders, framers, fathers. Nicely done! Dave K (21 years ago, 22-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | The Gun Debate Ad Nauseum —Richard Marchetti
|
| | | | | | (...) What can you mean?! You're starting to be quite the jerk about this subject. I write a long explanation and you hit me with some vague argument without explanation. I won't waste my time on you again like this... It was my understanding that (...) (21 years ago, 22-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: The Gun Debate Ad Nauseum —David Koudys
|
| | | | | | (...) Well, I decided to pull a "Richard" and delete the entire post and put in its place a trite answer. Seems to work well for you, so I thought it'd work equally as well for me. Dave K (21 years ago, 23-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Iraq (was Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap) —Richard Marchetti
|
| | | | (...) Well, I'd have to say the recent (last 50-75 years) histories of many South American countries is also proof that not having guns makes a country ripe for a dictatorship. So yeah, if that's not proof I don't know what is... I think Kooties (...) (21 years ago, 22-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Iraq (was Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap) —David Koudys
|
| | | | (...) And I would be in support of revoultions to overthrow tyrannies. Look, if you want to sell democracy to the world, which is a want that your country so obviously has, then you have to 'believe' (for lack of a better word) in democracy. These (...) (21 years ago, 22-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Iraq (was Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap) —Richard Marchetti
|
| | | | (...) Actually, I have to believe in a Republic -- because that's what we have. Personally, I am not at all interested in what other nations do for govt. I have no interst in selling democracy. Making the world free for democracy is a misguided (...) (21 years ago, 22-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Iraq (was Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap) —David Koudys
|
| | | | (...) Not so much in the 'officialdom' of your leaders. (...) Lovely words really. Words like "service" to the country, "defence of the fatherland"... Would almost sound like a draft to me. But I'm not up on all things Argentinian. (...) I have no (...) (21 years ago, 22-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
