Subject:
|
Re: The Gun Debate Ad Nauseum
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 23 Oct 2003 13:59:27 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1270 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Richard Marchetti wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys wrote:
| |
Selective interpretation at it’s finest!
Now look who’s disregarding the founders, framers, fathers.
|
What can you mean?! You’re starting to be quite the jerk about this subject.
I write a long explanation and you hit me with some vague argument without
explanation. I won’t waste my time on you again like this...
It was my understanding that one of your previous objections was my reliance
on archaic word usage, passages revealing legislative intent, etc. Here I
tried an ordinary dictionary definition version of the 2nd Amendment and
you’re still not satisfied?!
Frankly, don’t bother responding -- you lose. I think everyone that could
possibly be reading this sees that fact.
-- Hop-Frog
|
Well, I decided to pull a “Richard” and delete the entire post and put in its
place a trite answer.
Seems to work well for you, so I thought it’d work equally as well for me.
Dave K
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | The Gun Debate Ad Nauseum
|
| (...) What can you mean?! You're starting to be quite the jerk about this subject. I write a long explanation and you hit me with some vague argument without explanation. I won't waste my time on you again like this... It was my understanding that (...) (21 years ago, 22-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
220 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
