Subject:
|
Re: This Californian Has Voted. Have You?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 7 Oct 2003 21:24:07 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
250 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd wrote:
> Recall: no. Misuse of the recall procedure.
> Replace with: Peter Camejo (Green Party, No. 65 on the ballot)
This strikes me as weird. It's as if one is able to physically hedge their
vote. If one votes for "no" recall, how is it that one is able to cast a
hypothetical vote?
>
> Here's my summation of Things to Come:
>
> Arnold wins the election. The Democrats start an immediate recall movement
> based on Arnold's sexual misdeeds as charges are filed against him. Liberals
> start closing in on the required number of signatures. Maria convinces Arnold
> to switch parties! Democrats embrace him and suddenly decide all the charges
> are false (tossing recall forms in trash). The Republicans Fatal Attraction
> ends, fish the forms out of the trash, and take up the recall procedure,
> suddenly deciding that the charges are true. Record number of signatures
> acquired as virtually every liberal and conservative sign the recall, though in
> entirely separate time frames. Arnold is about to be declared not guilty, when
> he gooses the female judge. The Porn Starlet starts a unique campaign fund
> drive, that is the most honest in its approach ever (decorum prevents me from
> describing it <g>). She raises record funds and wins with by an overwheleming
> margin as she runs adds on all stations 24/7 the last week of the campaign. She
> dies from venereal diseases before she can take office and her newly appointed
> Lieutenant Governor (Bustamente quiting to work for the Indian Casinos)
> succeeds: Jerry Brown becomes Governor Moonbeam again!!! The entire nation
> prays to God for an earthquake. Unfortunately, Bruce (Hiho silver, away!) was
> on duty, pulled the moon too close, created massive tidal forces, fractured the
> San Andreas to the core, and the {rest} of the country slid under the waves.
> {Cue the Valkyries as Ragnorak ensues...}
>
>
Hmmm... It has intringe, sex, betrayal, sex, gambling, sex, sex, opera, sex,
religion, sex, tragedy, sex, disaster, sex, and sex. Won't fly-- needs a car
chase and more sex:-)
JOHN
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: This Californian Has Voted. Have You?
|
| (...) What does voting "no" have to do with it? What are you trying to say - only those who vote "yes" get to vote for the replacement, or do you really like to see another $40 million spent on a second election to resolve the recall if it is a (...) (21 years ago, 7-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: This Californian Has Voted. Have You?
|
| (...) Recall: no. Misuse of the recall procedure. Replace with: Peter Camejo (Green Party, No. 65 on the ballot) 53: No 54: No (...) No substance, all style. Doubt me? Look at how you refer to Arnold. :-) Here's my summation of Things to Come: (...) (21 years ago, 7-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
34 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
