Subject:
|
Re: Hotel Palestine
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 9 Apr 2003 06:33:59 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
172 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Kyle McDonald writes:
> Pedro Silva wrote:
> >
> > Whomever identified that hotel as a target, that person clearly has no
> > capability to foresee the consequences of his actions. Wouldn't any army be
> > better off expurged of such incompetents?
> > "Support the troops"... yeah, right. You might start to do that providing
> > them with some good sense!
>
>
> The leadership of the army knew that the hotel was full
> of journalists, and avoided making it an explicit target.
First Al Cezirah Baghdad office (bombing, 1 cameraman died, three injured),
then Abu Dabi TV Baghdad office (tank fire, no causalties), then Hotel
Palestine (tank fire, two died, three injured). All in yesterday, all in
just a single day.
I'm not as sure as yourself about "explicitness" of the targets. I have no
idea about their motives to kill two europeans, though. Maybe they just hit
the wrong room?..
Selçuk
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Hotel Palestine
|
| (...) Actually motives are a good question. What possible motive could they have had to kill *any* journalist, that would have provided a benefit to them that was worth all the bad press they are receiving now? They have been going out of their way (...) (21 years ago, 9-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Hotel Palestine
|
| (...) The leadership of the army knew that the hotel was full of journalists, and avoided making it an explicit target. However I don't think that every front line soldier is given a map of every building and told which to shoot and which not to. (...) (21 years ago, 8-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
49 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
