Subject:
|
Re: Freedom from information
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 27 Feb 2003 16:19:58 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
647 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler writes:
> You're also correct that the range of possible political stances is
> certainly a spectrum rather than a sharp delineation.
No. There's more to it than that. I am saying it's a field (of two or more
dimensions), not a spectrum (which is one dimensional).
We have in the past discussed possible axes... Using such axes it's possible
to more correctly describe areas of congruence and dissonance. You and I are
congruent in many areas and vastly differ in others, which a one dimensional
metric fails to capture. Similarly John and I have areas of congruence and
dissonance.
Libertarians are often described as social liberals and economic
conservatives. While highly inaccurate/oversimplified, it's at least more
accurate than saying we're "moderates". We are nothing of the sort, we're
quite radical. (and not monolithic either).
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Freedom from information
|
| (...) Hey buddy, *I'll* tell you what you're saying. And if my spectra have more dimensions than yours, pooh-pooh for you. So there! 8^) **snip of some good elucidation*** Dave! (21 years ago, 27-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Freedom from information
|
| (...) You make a fine point, though I should confess that I don't really mind being grouped that way. It's kind of like being thrown into the generic category of "animal" versus "vegetable" or "mineral." You're also correct that the range of (...) (21 years ago, 27-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
48 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
