 | | Re: What about the first? —David Koudys
|
| | | (...) Again, I think it did--take a fine example of Cuba--name one spot where Canadians can go on vacations that Americans, by law, cannot? Guess which cigar Canadians can smoke that Americans, by law, cannot. Now I'll connect the dots-- We try to (...) (21 years ago, 18-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: What about the first? —John Neal
|
| | | | | (...) Arrgg. This kind of moral equivalency is probably the most aggravating characteristic of the Left. To be unable to distinguish between being morally good and evil is *basic*! Dave, you sound silly when you call Bush or Blair "bad", but call (...) (21 years ago, 18-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: What about the first? —Fredrik Glöckner
|
| | | | | | (...) "Let he who is free from sin cast the first stone." Fredrik (21 years ago, 19-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: What about the first? —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | | (...) "Eh... All right. Two points, ah, two flats, and a packet of gravel." ;-) Scott A (...) (21 years ago, 19-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: What about the first? —John Neal
|
| | | | | | (...) So what are you trying to argue here? That *nobody* is worthy to confront evil? That *nobody* has the moral authority to rise up against tyrants, depots, or dictators? That *nobody* has the right to judge anyone else? I don't understand your (...) (21 years ago, 19-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: What about the first? —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | (...) I think he is simply asking for a little humility to be shown. Scott A (21 years ago, 19-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: What about the first? —John Neal
|
| | | | | | (...) But what does that mean? Humility is irrelevant. Your obfuscation is a dodge. JOHN (21 years ago, 19-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: What about the first? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | (...) When someone observed to Winston Churchill that his predecessor as prime minister, Neville Chamberlain, was a humble man, Churchill is reported to have replied, "And he has so much to be humble about." Ditto for some current European leaders (...) (21 years ago, 19-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: What about the first? —Pedro Silva
|
| | | | | | | (...) I agree. You can count my PM in the list :-/ Pedro (21 years ago, 19-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: What about the first? —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | | | | | | (...) And Bush! ;-) -->Bruce<-- (21 years ago, 19-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: What about the first? —John Neal
|
| | | | | | | | (...) I'm surprised, ->Bruce<-, that you'd even recognize humility in a leader, given whom you recently voted into office;-) JOHN (20 years ago, 28-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Paper Tigers [Re: What about the first?] —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | | (...) I feared that quote may have been erroneous. I did some checking. It turns up only in one place on the web: (URL) someone observed to Winston Churchill that his predecessor as prime minister, Neville Chamberlain, was a humble man, Churchill is (...) (21 years ago, 20-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: What about the first? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | (...) It turns out that if you leave a few words out of the search (URL) get a lot of sites with cites, most of which say that Churchill was talking about Clement Atlee, not Chamberlain, and most of which have a different wording. My memory of the (...) (20 years ago, 28-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: What about the first? —Don Heyse
|
| | | | | | | (...) Hey! That's way better than the lame excuse for an apology I got when you accidentally censored me! I demand an apology! ;^) Don (20 years ago, 28-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Appy polly logies (was Re: What about the first? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | | | (...) I sent you 3 or 4 already, and that exhausted my stock. Sorry, I'm fresh out now. :-) XFUT .fun because I hope this was in fun... (20 years ago, 28-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Appy polly logies (was Re: What about the first? —John Neal
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) Lar, perhaps (URL) this> might help. All I do is give, JOHN (20 years ago, 28-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Re: Appy polly logies (was Re: What about the first? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | | | | | (...) Thanks. but that actually seems to cost actual money. After buying 5 Maersks (even at US prices) I'm fresh out of that too. (...) ... or take, as the case may be. Are you getting a cut? Also, did you print the inscription on the shirt the nice (...) (20 years ago, 28-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Appy polly logies (was Re: What about the first? —John Neal
|
| | | | | | | | | | (...) I feel your pain and raise you 20 metroliners...;-) (...) I wish! ;-) (who even goes to that site??? I just punched in "imsorry" into Google and found it. About as lame as you can get IMO. I mean, "Epology"??? They don't even check for (...) (20 years ago, 28-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Appy polly logies (was Re: What about the first? —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Oh and I apologise for censoring you Larry, it was totally accidental, I promise... ROSCO (20 years ago, 28-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Appy polly logies (was Re: What about the first? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | | | (...) I think you mean censure, because: 1. There *is* no censorship practiced on LUGNET. Even accidentally. 2. AFAIK you don't have cancel privs anyway even if there was.(a) a - unless I missed a memo here somewhere... (rummages) nope. (20 years ago, 28-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: What about the first? —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | (...) Is this really the best explanation you can come up with after 15 months? That is not how it (URL) looks>. It looks like you tried to pass someone else's words off as your own (plagiarism) and infringed their IP rights in the process. Read (...) (20 years ago, 28-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: What about the first? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | | In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur wrote: (snip) I explained what happened, I admitted fault, and I apologised for it. If it doesn't fit the format of the apology you want, or doesn't fit the facts as you imagine them to be, tough. Take it or (...) (20 years ago, 28-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: What about the first? —Don Heyse
|
| | | | | | (...) I use google, and you're right, I did need to look up the first biggie. Unfortunately the top link from google didn't help much: (URL) of assidious> Or maybe that was sneaky debator's trick for calling someone an insidious @$$ and passing it (...) (20 years ago, 28-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: What about the first? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | | (...) are you an assiduous and malintentioned nitpicker? If not, I wasn't talking to you Scott, apologies if you think I was, but therefore I wasn't insulting you. If you are, then, by your own admission, identifying you as such isn't an insult, (...) (20 years ago, 28-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: What about the first? —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | | | | | In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek wrote: **snip** (...) **snip** (URL) On a related note...> 8^) (20 years ago, 28-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Re: What about the first? —John Neal
|
| | | | | | | | | | | (...) Which reminds me of (URL) this> (...) (20 years ago, 28-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | our local rhino —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | | | | | (...) Sadly, our local rhino died just a few days ago. We are RZSS members pretty much because of Kruger; so the zoo was rather empty without him last weekend ;-( His mate, Umfolozi (AKA (URL) "Floozy">), looked pretty sad. Scott A (20 years ago, 28-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: What about the first? —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | | | Can anyone tell me exactly what this is achieving? Is there any sort of aim to these attacks on me? Is this “constructive” Don? Should I just ignore him? Is his behavior acceptable? Is he obsessed by me? Should I be flattered by the attention? (URL) (...) (20 years ago, 28-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.terms, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: What about the first? —Don Heyse
|
| | | | | | (...) Wow, you folks are sensitive. I thought the typo and the bizare link from google were kinda funny. I even added a smiley to go with the winky, but lugnet squashed my attempt to set FUT to .fun. Gotta figure out how to do that. Anyhow, the only (...) (20 years ago, 28-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: What about the first? —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | | (...) "I take it then, that Canadians aren't buying SUVs?" If you are going to castigate Americans for something that Canadians are doing (wasting oil through self-indulgence), you aren't going to garner a lot of respect for whatever point you are (...) (21 years ago, 18-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: What about the first? —Pedro Silva
|
| | | | | (...) Even though I can easily agree with you on that (oil for US consumption which is not from the GoM or Alaska comes primarily either from Venezuela or West African countries), I think I must point out one does not need to *use* the oil to (...) (21 years ago, 19-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: What about the first? —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | | | | (...) Wrong in the sense that I never said that U.S. companies do not benefit from Middle Eastern oil in any way. Dave is saying we want their oil because we are sucking up so much Middle Eastern oil (and specifically Iraqi oil) with our SUVs. My (...) (21 years ago, 19-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: What about the first? —Pedro Silva
|
| | | | | | | (...) You are correct, you did not say that at any time. I also did not say you did say it... :-) I just call your attention to the fact that it would be wrong *if* you had that in mind. Therefere I chose the words "as you said it" to be highlighted (...) (21 years ago, 19-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | "US buys up Iraqi oil to stave off crisis" [was Re: What about the first?] —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | (...) Really? Read this: US buys up Iraqi oil to stave off crisis (URL) its most chronic shortage in oil stocks for 27 years, the US has this month turned to an unlikely source of help - Iraq. Weeks before a prospective invasion of Iraq, the (...) (21 years ago, 19-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: What about the first? —Pedro Silva
|
| | | | | (...) Even though I can easily agree with you on that (oil for US consumption which is not from the GoM or Alaska comes primarily either from Venezuela or West African countries), I think I must point out one does not need to *use* the oil to (...) (21 years ago, 19-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: What about the first? —Pedro Silva
|
| | | | | | (sorry about the double-post... my bad) :-$ Pedro (21 years ago, 19-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: What about the first? —David Koudys
|
| | | | (...) I love analogies... If I know someone who has an alcohol problem, do I have to have an alcohol problem? If I know someone who hates Islam and wants to kill anyone who believes in that religion, do I have to carry a gun and start shooting as (...) (21 years ago, 19-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: What about the first? —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | | (...) No, but if you do, then perhaps you should attend to yourself before lecturing others. (major snip) (...) I read where you were running on about someone hating Islam, which has nothing to do with the subject at hand, so I simply deleted it as (...) (21 years ago, 19-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: What about the first? —David Koudys
|
| | | | In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd writes: <snip> (...) What I want you to realize is that writing off valid points as 'straw man arguments' and 'wiggling and changing the tune', and deleting examples that are completely valid and true (...) (21 years ago, 19-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
