Subject:
|
Re: FOTY, at least for me.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sat, 19 Jan 2002 23:53:04 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
616 times
|
| |
|
|
Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> So NC State, while within rights to limit activity on their property (if
> it's not government owned), is still misguided by interfering in the market.
Oh, I never said it was a good thing for them to do. I'm not sure how I
feel about a government university limiting this particular activity on
their property. Obviously it would be better if the university were not
government in the first place...
Frank
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: FOTY, at least for me.
|
| (...) I'm not sure why a private University would be necessarily better? In the UK, as far a I know, there is only one university which is wholly privately owned and funded (most are nominally privately owned, but are largely funded by the taxpayer) (...) (23 years ago, 21-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: FOTY, at least for me.
|
| (...) But you see NC State is wrong. Even those people are doing a service. My former employer got season ticks to the Pistons one year, and they were more hapless than usual, winning hardly any important games. So it got to where the firm was (...) (23 years ago, 19-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
33 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
