Subject:
|
Re: LEGO sells "violent" toys?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.mediawatch
|
Date:
|
Tue, 16 Nov 2004 00:19:33 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2042 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.mediawatch, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> In lugnet.mediawatch, Dave Schuler wrote:
>
>
> > Should this be FUT'ed to OT.debate? I didn't want to steer it that way, but
> > now that I think of it I may have. Oh, well--send replies there if
> > appropriate.
>
> Parts of this thread appear to be veering that way, yes.I probably should
> have set the FUT myself on my post way back up thread.
>
> I'll forcefut the thread or parts, if people ask me to offline.
My apologies. I think I may have inadvertently spun the thread into a debate
mode. In all honesty, that wasn't my intention. I should have just posted the
link and kept my comments to a minimum.
Regards,
Allan B.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: LEGO sells "violent" toys?
|
| (...) Parts of this thread appear to be veering that way, yes.I probably should have set the FUT myself on my post way back up thread. I'll forcefut the thread or parts, if people ask me to offline. (20 years ago, 16-Nov-04, to lugnet.mediawatch, FTX)
|
27 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
