Subject:
|
Re: LEGO sells "violent" toys?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.mediawatch
|
Date:
|
Tue, 16 Nov 2004 00:05:17 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2049 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.mediawatch, Dave Schuler wrote:
| |
Should this be FUT’ed to OT.debate? I didn’t want to steer it that way, but
now that I think of it I may have. Oh, well--send replies there if
appropriate.
|
Parts of this thread appear to be veering that way, yes.I probably should have
set the FUT myself on my post way back up thread.
I’ll forcefut the thread or parts, if people ask me to offline.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: LEGO sells "violent" toys?
|
| (...) My apologies. I think I may have inadvertently spun the thread into a debate mode. In all honesty, that wasn't my intention. I should have just posted the link and kept my comments to a minimum. Regards, Allan B. (20 years ago, 16-Nov-04, to lugnet.mediawatch)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: LEGO sells "violent" toys?
|
| (...) That's for darned sure. Meanwhile, it's considered un-patriotic to criticize the actual violence inflicted upon innocent civilians overseas (well, "overseas" relative to the US, I mean). I had all kinds of toy guns and knives when I was a kid, (...) (20 years ago, 15-Nov-04, to lugnet.mediawatch, FTX)
|
27 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
