Subject:
|
Re: Wow! This guy is good!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Thu, 8 Jun 2000 19:42:55 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1078 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, James Brown writes:
> And as to the 'must be fake'...
For the record, I don't doubt that someone could actually do the portraits. I
certainly have seen things people have done that I think are even *more*
impressive.... I find 3-D modelling and especially intricate clever uses of
small pieces to be much more impressive than something like this.
However, I want to clear something up: When I said "if I think they must be
computer done then they are really good" it was actually meant as a complement.
I think they are very, very well done.
The question about Eric Harshbarger's PixelLEGO was an honest one, but as Todd
posited, I think they would have been in a different style if they had been run
through that.
eric
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Wow! This guy is good!
|
| As a point of information, I'm quite certain that the images are not from PixelLEGO or other such program. If you examine a PixelLEGO image at high magnification you'll see that each color is homogeneous. If you examine the images in question at (...) (24 years ago, 17-Jun-00, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Wow! This guy is good!
|
| (...) Well, I suppose they could be faked, but then, he's going to run into a rough spot if someone wins the Einstein portrait he's got up on eBay... And as to the 'must be fake'... Legoland has portraits of similar (or greater) size and complexity, (...) (24 years ago, 6-Jun-00, to lugnet.general)
|
34 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
