To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 17794
17793  |  17795
Subject: 
Re: Why can't we have a Lando: Lego's Race policy
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.starwars, lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Sun, 30 Apr 2000 18:26:10 GMT
Viewed: 
229 times
  
> > Aye, true.  But, as I said before, this particular theme is based in • something
> > real.  This is the first time that TLC has made minifigs based on real live
> > people, and I question their stand on it, because it doesn't make sense to
> > me.
> 
> Luke and Han are not alive.  Mark Hammil and Harrison Ford just depicted the
> Characters for our entertainment.  :)

That's what I meant...
> 
> > They strive for accuracy, especially in the Star Wars line, (even if they
> > do a sometimes bad job of it) and I don't know why they don't make minifigs
> > accurate as well.
> 
> The minifigs *are* accurate.  The Han Solo minifig is a minifig depiction of
> Han Solo, just as Harrison Ford was a human depiction of Han Solo.  The minifg
> is not a depiction of Harrison Ford as Han Solo.

True.  So depict Lando instead of Billy Dee.  No problems there.
> 
> > Also, kind of a thing for the entire thread:  Does anyone else notice that • all
> > these different race sets (the Indian set in particular) are all rather old?
> 
> 1997 is old??  What're trying to do, make me feel like an old fogie?  I'm only
> 20!  :D
> 
> If you're talking about the Big People Native American set, then, yes, that is
> old.  But notice how that set is the only one ever made with a different
> colored human minifig?  Perhaps they recieved a number of complaints.

The latter.
> 
> > Even 5 years ago society didn't have this "need" to be politically correct.
> > What is it with people now?  Everyone is afraid that what they say might not
> > be accepted as the "norm."  I say speak your mind; don't let someone else
> > dictate it.  If I have something to say, I say it.  Granted, sometimes it's
> > tactless, but it's my opinion.  THEN I worry about what others think, and
> > respond accordingly.
> 
> I try to be pollitically correct because I see it as being polite.  Also,
> sometimes politically correct is just that: Correct.  For Example, I try not • to
> call Native Americans "Indians" because they are not from India.  :)
> 
> Jeff

You can be polite and not be politically correct.  I was brought up (I'm 17)
calling Native Americans "Indians."  I do not think this is inaccurate; no
more than "Native Americans," unless they called it America and not the
Spanish or whoever...

I understand your point, and I don't disagree with you.  People should be
polite and correct.  But, that doesn't change the fact that people want
Lando.  I just wondered how this all would work out (if they even make him at
all) and how they would handle it.
-Chris



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Why can't we have a Lando: Lego's Race policy
 
(...) Luke and Han are not alive. Mark Hammil and Harrison Ford just depicted the Characters for our entertainment. :) (...) The minifigs *are* accurate. The Han Solo minifig is a minifig depiction of Han Solo, just as Harrison Ford was a human (...) (26 years ago, 30-Apr-00, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)

66 Messages in This Thread:
























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR