To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 16558
16557  |  16559
Subject: 
Re: LEGO name branding (was: Re: Stuff I'd like to see...)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general
Date: 
Sat, 18 Mar 2000 15:34:52 GMT
Viewed: 
1265 times
  

It could ultimately cost TLC billions of dollars if it lost is brand name --
if someone proved it had become generic.  Putting notices on boxes and in
catalogs asking people not to say "legos" will never work -- you have to show
the masses out there that there are other things besides plastic binding
bricks which are labeled "LEGO".  And maybe that doesn't even work, but it's
the only thing that makes sense to me as to why they're pumping up the brand.
(Unless they're ramping up for an IPO in 2005 or something........)

--Todd

[followups to lugnet.general]

     I agree with Todd.  I think the reason this crop of kids aren't as
interested in Lego, and similar activities, is because they're used to being
spoonfed their entertainment.  It's all so passive.  I think that's shifting
with the interactivities of the internet versus mindless television watching,
but still, if a kid wants to know something, instead of going out to find it,
he can point and click his way and never leave the house.
     Lego needs to show kids that it's "hip" to be creative. (or "Phat" or
whatever)  I work with kids, and when I get bring out the lego stuff, many
have difficulty getting past the directions and thinking outside of the box.
Or else, they'll say, "Here, make me a boat."
     When a kid plays a Lego video game, he will relate more to Lego.  He'll
say, "Wow, that racer is pretty cool.  Wait I can build one in real life."
Having that recognition, the relevance, is important to build the bridge.
Mass media blitz works for getting the favorable opinion of kids.  I think
it's manipulative in most cases, but it is a valuable tool for those who know
how to use it.

Markus



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: LEGO name branding (was: Re: Stuff I'd like to see...)
 
(...) Except for those bricks that either (a) never existed or (b) haven't been produced for years, so the kid doesn't have any. While I think Ice Planet, Royal Knights, etc. are great, why did LEGO think it a good idea to include long-gone themes (...) (25 years ago, 20-Mar-00, to lugnet.general)

Message is in Reply To:
  LEGO name branding (was: Re: Stuff I'd like to see...)
 
(...) Maybe Belville never was intended to compete with Barbie. Maybe the video games never were intended to compete with Doom or Myst. Maybe the LEGO Watches line never was intended to compete with Swatch or Times. etc., etc. (...) If you think of (...) (25 years ago, 18-Mar-00, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)

35 Messages in This Thread:












Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR