Subject:
|
Re: Going Against the Grain
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.dear-lego
|
Date:
|
Tue, 23 Jan 2001 18:16:09 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1527 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.dear-lego, Felix Greco writes:
> When
> Newsgroups become clogged with complianing about declining quality and such
> it takes away from what I love about Lugnet.
>
> (and, to whom it may concern, please don't respond to this and say everyone
> is entitled to express their own opinion... I know that)
But everyone IS entitled to their opinion and...
Sorry, I had to.
I agree though, "this set sucks but is good for parts" is becoming redundant
and has reached the level of "me too" posts. I think a lot of the Star Wars
ships are very good in terms of buildability (if it isn't a word already it
is now, maybe I should register it as a domain name :) and not having too
many useless chunks.
I'm as guilty as anyone though of looking at newer sets only as parts souces
only because that is the general direction of my accumulating and building
right now and has less to do the quality of sets.
junior
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Going Against the Grain
|
| (...) Many of the SW ships are very good. My main gripe in that instance is the inclusion of off-color bricks. (ie Green 2x4's in the Imperial Shuttle) (...) Oh I look at all sets as parts sources, but I still have an opinion about the way the sets (...) (23 years ago, 23-Jan-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Going Against the Grain
|
| (...) No. All the posts lately are very inflammatory, and I don't get it. It would be different if Lego was putting out 'nothing but' juniorization and z-nap. But we've got model class x-wings, lego direct, and other stuff that I see as very (...) (23 years ago, 23-Jan-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
38 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
