Subject:
|
Re: Castle structure advice...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.castle
|
Date:
|
Fri, 3 Dec 1999 07:50:03 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1207 times
|
| |
|
|
Paul Davidson wrote:
> I'd go with the hinges. It's always an impressive engineering feat, and
> that way you really have *two* castles -- an 360-degree viewable castle for
> display (in unopened position), and a double-big cut-away castle to show off
> the interior. Better than a simple cut-away castle for sure!
Someone mentioned Technic pins, which I think is the best way to go for large
modular constructions--could you build it in six or seven vertically-integrated
sections that then link together with Technic pins? That way you could pull it
apart and refigure it any way you liked--though that might be a bit less organic
than you want.
best,
Lindsay
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Castle structure advice...
|
| (...) vertically-integrated (...) it (...) organic (...) My new castle is using the Technic pins, it has six modules. The size of the foundation, which is 13 bricks high, 2 burps high all around, is 4.5x4.5 baseplates (144x144 studs). There are 3 (...) (25 years ago, 3-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Castle structure advice...
|
| I'd go with the hinges. It's always an impressive engineering feat, and that way you really have *two* castles -- an 360-degree viewable castle for display (in unopened position), and a double-big cut-away castle to show off the interior. Better (...) (25 years ago, 3-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
19 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
