To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.castleOpen lugnet.castle in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Castle / 452
451  |  453
Subject: 
Re: Ninja vs. "real" Castle (was: Re: More news on 2000 lineup!)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general, lugnet.castle
Followup-To: 
lugnet.castle
Date: 
Mon, 8 Nov 1999 23:07:48 GMT
Viewed: 
219 times
  
In lugnet.general, "Kevin Loch" <kloch@opnsys.com> writes:

In lugnet.general, Todd Lehman writes:
OK, he also wrote that he was hoping for another year of Ninja, but maybe
that was because he either liked Ninja (which I would argue is "OK" :-) or
because he felt that recent themes like Fright Knights, Dark Forest, and
Royal Knights had only been pale imitations of the glory years anyway.

what was wrong with Royal Knights?

I didn't say there was anything wrong with it.  I didn't even say that it
was a pale imitation of glory-year sets.  I said Thad -might- have felt that
it was.  Just speculation.

Me, I'm a Space head, and I hate all Castle stuff anyway, except for the
cool parts.  (Just kidding ;-)

--Todd

[followups to lugnet.castle]



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Ninja vs. "real" Castle (was: Re: More news on 2000 lineup!)
 
(...) what was wrong with Royal Knights? KL (25 years ago, 8-Nov-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.castle)

49 Messages in This Thread:























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR