Subject:
|
Re: (CW) Realm Scale
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.castle
|
Date:
|
Thu, 10 Feb 2000 04:46:10 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1178 times
|
| |
|
|
> > What happens if people have realms completely surrounding me, and I need to
> > expand?
>
>
> I was wondering about that too.
From my preliminary talks with Craig, no two realms can touch side by side -
only on the corners. So:
XOXOX
OSOXO
XOXOX
If S is Shiri's Realm, then there are four other realms touching it - at the
four corners. The four realms on the sides are "neutral" realms which
cannot be built upon? (come up with reasons ... swamp, heat, dryness, etc...)
We'll give it more thought before we actually put the map online.
-- pn
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: (CW) Realm Scale
|
| (...) yes, sort of another spoiler, then. what better field of play than a chessboard? every other square is a realm. all realms are connected on a diagonal. (also the routes used for RDP's!) the in between squares are NB, standing for Natural (...) (25 years ago, 10-Feb-00, to lugnet.castle)
| | | Re: (CW) Realm Scale
|
| (...) PMFJI. Is it necessary that the 'populated' area of a realm fill the entire "square" of the layout? If you assume the baseplate'd region is only a part of the entire square, then people will have plenty of room for expansion. Steve (25 years ago, 10-Feb-00, to lugnet.castle)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: (CW) Realm Scale
|
| (...) time (...) I think you misunderstood Craig here. Notice this line, quoted: "a realm need not be filled with structures, tho'. one may want an isolated structure or small villlage surrounded by forest. chronicling four ballads essentially (...) (25 years ago, 10-Feb-00, to lugnet.castle)
|
25 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
