Subject:
|
Re: (CW) Realm Scale
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.castle
|
Date:
|
Thu, 10 Feb 2000 03:56:22 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
964 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.castle, Craig Hamilton writes:
> hi y'all ~
>
> at this point, i'm proposing scale for realms. as each realm is a square
> on a grid, picture that square divided 16 x16. each of these squares equals
> a 32x32 baseplate.
>
> does this sound good to everyone? :-)
Hmm. That's a much smaller scale than I was thinking it would be. I was
thinking of realms more in terms of "miles" than in studs...I assumed more of a
map scale, where a city would be represented by a dot... in this scale, I can
easily see a city taking up half a realm or more.
My current project is a keep, not even a full castle, and it takes up 5x5
squares on that scale...If I want two big structures in my realm, they're going
to be rock-chucking distance!
Honestly, I'd really rethink that scale... 512 studs is only a couple hours
walk for a minifig!
James
http://www.shades-of-night.com/lego/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: (CW) Realm Scale
|
| (...) realm being 512 by 512, I thought that was 512 32x32 baseplates by 512 32x32 baseplates, not 16 32x32 baseplates by 16 32x32 baseplates. This would be several orders of magnitude more space, and more realistically represent continent-sized (...) (25 years ago, 10-Feb-00, to lugnet.castle)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | (CW) Realm Scale
|
| hi y'all ~ at this point, i'm proposing scale for realms. as each realm is a square on a grid, picture that square divided 16 x16. each of these squares equals a 32x32 baseplate. does this sound good to everyone? :-) we can thank m. uring for the (...) (25 years ago, 10-Feb-00, to lugnet.castle)
|
25 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
