Subject:
|
Re: Legacy Files on the Parts Tracker
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Tue, 30 Sep 2003 06:35:35 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
517 times
|
| |
|
|
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Andrew Westrate wrote:
> Another thing I don't like, is how we keep primitive files on hold, even
> when there is nothing wrong with them. I agree that they shouldn't be
> released if they aren't used, but it would be far easier to have someone
> upload a group of ring, cone, and torus primitives as a block, review
> them all at once, and create a special state that sets them aside until
> they are used (for instance, "Approved Primitive").
I think something like this (or just releasing unused primitives) would be
useful. There is a clear advantage to "locking in" primitives: they are
designed to be used by multiple authors; if they are not properly examined
and said to be good, they may need to be changed. . .breaking parts that
used them. (Especially with parts on the Tracker for a long time,
multiple parts might use a primitive before there is a strong reason to
review it carefully.)
--
TWS Garrison
http://www.math.purdue.edu/~tgarriso/
Remove capital letters in address for direct reply.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Legacy Files on the Parts Tracker
|
| In general, I agree with Orion that having the parts tracker is much better than not having it, and that the main problem is that there are too few active reviewers. Just as a reminder to those reviewers out there, look at the parts queue, which (...) (21 years ago, 29-Sep-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
24 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
