To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldrawOpen lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / Organizations / LDraw / 2583
2582  |  2584
Subject: 
Re: Legacy Files on the Parts Tracker
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
Date: 
Wed, 1 Oct 2003 04:55:58 GMT
Viewed: 
363 times
  
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Andrew Westrate wrote:
<snip>

But, I do think that there could be some improvements with the parts tracker.
For one thing, I don't like how files with subfiles always get sorted to the
bottom of the parts list, because then they  always say "X subfiles aren't
certified" instead of "needs more votes" or "needs admin review."  I can't think
of any reason the minifig suticase hasn't been approved, other than it sorts to
the bottom of the queue, and so hasn't attracted the admins' attentions.  I
think a way to fix this is to have the status ignore subfiles until it has
gotten all the votes it needs.  Then these parts would go from "needs votes"
(SX) to "needs admin review" (CCSX) to "has uncertified subfiles" (ACCSX) to
"certified" (ACCX).

I agree that the way subfiles are handled is a bit klunky, but I can't think of
a better way to handle them.

Another thing I don't like, is how we keep primitive files on hold, even when
there is nothing wrong with them.  I agree that they shouldn't be released if
they aren't used, but it would be far easier to have someone upload a group of
ring, cone, and torus primitives as a block, review them all at once, and create
a special state that sets them aside until they are used (for instance,
"Approved Primitive").

Yes, I think that we should shift away from holding unused primitives.  A simple
novote would suffice or maybe a "Certified but not in use" flag.

-Orion



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Legacy Files on the Parts Tracker
 
In general, I agree with Orion that having the parts tracker is much better than not having it, and that the main problem is that there are too few active reviewers. Just as a reminder to those reviewers out there, look at the parts queue, which (...) (21 years ago, 29-Sep-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

24 Messages in This Thread:











Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR