To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldrawOpen lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / Organizations / LDraw / 2583
2582  |  2584
Subject: 
Re: Legacy Files on the Parts Tracker
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
Date: 
Wed, 1 Oct 2003 04:55:58 GMT
Viewed: 
5269 times
  
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Andrew Westrate wrote:
> <snip>
> 
> But, I do think that there could be some improvements with the parts tracker.
> For one thing, I don't like how files with subfiles always get sorted to the
> bottom of the parts list, because then they  always say "X subfiles aren't
> certified" instead of "needs more votes" or "needs admin review."  I can't think
> of any reason the minifig suticase hasn't been approved, other than it sorts to
> the bottom of the queue, and so hasn't attracted the admins' attentions.  I
> think a way to fix this is to have the status ignore subfiles until it has
> gotten all the votes it needs.  Then these parts would go from "needs votes"
> (SX) to "needs admin review" (CCSX) to "has uncertified subfiles" (ACCSX) to
> "certified" (ACCX).

I agree that the way subfiles are handled is a bit klunky, but I can't think of
a better way to handle them.

> Another thing I don't like, is how we keep primitive files on hold, even when
> there is nothing wrong with them.  I agree that they shouldn't be released if
> they aren't used, but it would be far easier to have someone upload a group of
> ring, cone, and torus primitives as a block, review them all at once, and create
> a special state that sets them aside until they are used (for instance,
> "Approved Primitive").

Yes, I think that we should shift away from holding unused primitives.  A simple
novote would suffice or maybe a "Certified but not in use" flag.

-Orion



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Legacy Files on the Parts Tracker
 
In general, I agree with Orion that having the parts tracker is much better than not having it, and that the main problem is that there are too few active reviewers. Just as a reminder to those reviewers out there, look at the parts queue, which (...) (23 years ago, 29-Sep-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

24 Messages in This Thread:











Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR