Subject:
|
Bugs with the Parts Tracker
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Tue, 7 Oct 2003 15:14:13 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
438 times
|
| |
|
|
[emphasis Franklin's]
> I don't like how files with subfiles ... always say "X subfiles
> aren't certified" *_instead_of_* "needs more votes" or "needs
> admin review."
Here's a good example of why the current nomenclature is messed up
(in my humble, yet aggressively vociferous, opinion).
http://www.ldraw.org//cgi-bin/ptdetail.cgi?f=parts/30375csd.dat
This new file does not -- repeat ***NOT*** -- need any unofficial
parts, and yet it says "UNCERTIFIED FILES" instead of "NEEDS VOTES/
ADMIN REVIEW".
Thanks,
Franklin
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Bugs with the Parts Tracker
|
| (...) First off, a bigger issue with this file is that it is a model, not a part. I feel it goes beyond the idea of a shortcut, or complete assembly. However, to your point. This file uses *3* unofficial files. Yes, they are updates of (...) (21 years ago, 3-Nov-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Legacy Files on the Parts Tracker
|
| In general, I agree with Orion that having the parts tracker is much better than not having it, and that the main problem is that there are too few active reviewers. Just as a reminder to those reviewers out there, look at the parts queue, which (...) (21 years ago, 29-Sep-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
24 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
