Subject:
|
Re: Legacy Files on the Parts Tracker
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Wed, 8 Oct 2003 17:57:17 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
388 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Dan Boger wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 05:11:33PM +0000, Andrew Westrate wrote:
> > I think a way to fix this is to have the status ignore subfiles until
> > it has gotten all the votes it needs. Then these parts would go from
> > "needs votes" (SX) to "needs admin review" (CCSX) to "has uncertified
> > subfiles" (ACCSX) to "certified" (ACCX).
>
> But how can you certify a part that uses subparts, if the subparts might
> change? Maybe the orientation of the file will change, and then the
> parent part would have to be modified?
>
> Or am I missing something?
No, that's a very good point. You're correct, that the subparts have to be
certified first. I was really trying to advocate changing just the sort order
of the parts tracker list (so that parts at the bottom of the page don't get
ignored), not any of the underlying logic of the review process.
Andy
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Legacy Files on the Parts Tracker
|
| (...) OK, so let's figure out a better sort order. The possible 'statuses' for files are: - Certified! - Needs Admin review - Needs more votes - Subfiles aren't certified - Hold My thinking when I constructed the list and the sorting was: - Keep the (...) (21 years ago, 3-Nov-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Legacy Files on the Parts Tracker
|
| (...) But how can you certify a part that uses subparts, if the subparts might change? Maybe the orientation of the file will change, and then the parent part would have to be modified? Or am I missing something? (21 years ago, 29-Sep-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
24 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
