Subject:
|
Re: Legacy Files on the Parts Tracker
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Tue, 7 Oct 2003 13:39:51 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
350 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Andrew Westrate wrote:
> In general, I agree with Orion that having the parts tracker is much better than
> not having it, and that the main problem is that there are too few active
> reviewers. Just as a reminder to those reviewers out there, look at the parts
> queue, which sorts parts by age:
> <http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptqueue.cgi?full=0>
>
>
> But, I do think that there could be some improvements with the parts tracker.
> For one thing, I don't like how files with subfiles always get sorted to the
> bottom of the parts list, because then they always say "X subfiles aren't
> certified" instead of "needs more votes" or "needs admin review."
There may be merit in somehow boosting the position of the subfiles themselves
in the list (if it's true that people only work on the highest listed items and
ignore the bottom stuff... I know it's true for me). Perhaps the more parts use
an uncertified subfile, the higher it ought to sort??? Getting them approved
seems like it might unlogjam some things.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Legacy Files on the Parts Tracker
|
| In general, I agree with Orion that having the parts tracker is much better than not having it, and that the main problem is that there are too few active reviewers. Just as a reminder to those reviewers out there, look at the parts queue, which (...) (21 years ago, 29-Sep-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
24 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
