Subject:
|
Re: Legacy Files on the Parts Tracker
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Mon, 6 Oct 2003 21:33:25 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
452 times
|
| |
|
|
At 09:35 PM 10/5/2003 +0000, Franklin W. Cain wrote:
> > I don't like how files with subfiles always get sorted to the
> > bottom of the parts list, because then they always say "X subfiles
> > aren't certified" (instead of "needs more votes" or "needs admin
> > review)"...
>
> THANK YOU!!! I've been arguing this very point (mostly off-list)
> with Steve for the better part of three years now!
>
> Pummelling the deceased equine,
> Franklin
FWIW, I agree with this.
Though I am a parts reviewer, I don't have a terribly extensive collection
of pieces to compare the LDraw ones with. And the Real World doesn't leave
much time to review parts!
--Ryan (explaining his credentials to post in this thread ;-)
http://users.ifriendly.com/fourfarrs1
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Legacy Files on the Parts Tracker
|
| In general, I agree with Orion that having the parts tracker is much better than not having it, and that the main problem is that there are too few active reviewers. Just as a reminder to those reviewers out there, look at the parts queue, which (...) (21 years ago, 29-Sep-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
24 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
