Subject:
|
Re: Legacy Files on the Parts Tracker
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Mon, 3 Nov 2003 21:35:43 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
433 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Steve Bliss wrote:
> <snip>
> What could be changed is the definition of 'subfiles aren't certified'. Maybe
> files shouldn't be given that categorization until after they have enough votes
> for release.
I like this idea. It solve the perceived de-emphasis on [art with uncertified
subparts.
> Another thought is to not list subfiles on the main page at all -- some people
> (Rosco, for example) tend to approach reviews in a holistic manner - review a
> part and its subfiles all at once.
I think the parts list should list everything currently on the PT. This way I
can find a subfile I may have missed or wasn't included in a model I downloaded
if I don't know the parent part.
-Orion
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Legacy Files on the Parts Tracker
|
| (...) OK, so let's figure out a better sort order. The possible 'statuses' for files are: - Certified! - Needs Admin review - Needs more votes - Subfiles aren't certified - Hold My thinking when I constructed the list and the sorting was: - Keep the (...) (21 years ago, 3-Nov-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
24 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
