 | | Re: VOTING now working
|
|
BTW, does everyone use the Abstain option? I will generally abstain on any piece I don't have, unless there are obvious problems with a part. Steve (...) (26 years ago, 1-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: parts wanted
|
|
(...) Ah. That clears it up. I'll dig up one of these pieces when I get home, to be sure I understand. Steve (26 years ago, 1-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Part Numbering Crisis in LDraw
|
|
(...) about (...) part (...) That still wouldn't make it possible in Ldraw to (I)nsert a new piece, change the (P)art number, then type the part number of the part which is in your hand, and have it inserted. Multi-part parts are a problem, of (...) (26 years ago, 1-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: parts wanted
|
|
(...) I probably did a bad job at explaining what is wrong. Looking at the 2853 part with the grey axle pointing towards you, you'll see a round hole in the grey surface next to the axle which sticks out. (This hole is rectangular on some versions (...) (26 years ago, 1-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | RE: part: panel 1 x 2 x 1 with black grille pattern
|
|
(...) I think it is a bad tendency if we are going to speculate in specific rendering programs: adding extra drawing commands, so that at least some of them will show under certain circumstances. Hints for specific rendering techniques should be (...) (26 years ago, 1-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: parts wanted
|
|
(...) I'm not following the problem, here. It may because I don't have one of these pieces to look at, but I'm not seeing what shows through, and if something did show through, how having rounded-end axles would help. I modified your code to use a (...) (26 years ago, 1-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: VOTING now working
|
|
Terry, I have a suggestion. I just voted like a senator again :-, abstaining from about half the votes. I don't know what the typical vote turnout is like, but in my method of voting, it would be pretty cool if all the votes default to "Abstain". As (...) (26 years ago, 1-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | RE: part: panel 1 x 2 x 1 with black grille pattern [DAT]
|
|
(...) Actually I sent Terry an update to 3004P06.DAT some weeks ago using quads rather than rect.dat. It is going to be in the next parts update. Also mine stripes are more accurate when you put two bricks on top of each other with one of them (...) (26 years ago, 1-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Part Numbering Crisis in LDraw
|
|
Steve Bliss wrote in message <36daaf01.8075147@lu...et.com>... (...) I'd say you're most certainly right here since their numbering system would be for premarket tracking and not as we would use it in the post-market. Does anyone know if TLG sells (...) (26 years ago, 1-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: parts i plan to do
|
|
(...) But don't dump all the parts into the parts tracker -- wait until you are reasonably close to working on a part before adding it. Steve (26 years ago, 1-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Quality of authored parts
|
|
(...) Sometimes 'gripping extrusions' are drawn, sometimes not. Depends on the size of the extrusion. I agree about the lips. Why don't you try one, and see how it looks? Steve (26 years ago, 1-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Quality of authored parts
|
|
(...) I'm certainly not offended. OTOH, I'm going to keep with the standard LDraw simplifications, at least to the extent of not including the dimples beneath the studs on plates and bricks. Steve (26 years ago, 1-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Part Numbering Crisis in LDraw
|
|
(...) Why don't we reference these part numbers as comments in the part-file, perhaps on a 0 KEYWORDS line? Although that would be a headache to deal with, making sure that all new parts get all the appropriate part numbers... Steve (26 years ago, 1-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Part Numbering Crisis in LDraw
|
|
(...) That's not much better, because a new part-file is still required whenever a new color is released. Steve "I should probably keep these responses in the outbox until after I've read all 60 incoming messages" Bliss (26 years ago, 1-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Part Numbering Crisis in LDraw
|
|
(...) I think TLG's numbering always boils down to manufacturing and inventory control. A part number is needed for each molded part, so each subpart needs its own number. And the aggregate, post-gluing part needs a number to track its insertion (...) (26 years ago, 1-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Part Numbering Crisis in LDraw
|
|
(...) You've just hit on my pet peeve with the approach of using the most official numbers for LDraw parts -- often, the most official number is *not* the one you find stamped on the part. This will be true if: - You are looking at a multi-part (...) (26 years ago, 1-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: DAT voting page up
|
|
(...) Now, if they were going backwards, they'd really be moonwalking[1] Steve [1] A dance move made popular by Michael Jackson, where the dancer walks backward, but makes it look like they are walking forward. (26 years ago, 1-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: DAT voting page up
|
|
(...) True, but it's also a precedent. I'd rather have the bottom surface than curved edges. I'd consider a part with all surfaces more accurate than a part with closely-modeled upper surfaces, but the underside completely missing. Maybe I'm just (...) (26 years ago, 1-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Soccer ball pattern
|
|
(...) Seems like there should be a soccer-ball tessalation[1] somewhere on the web, which could be ported to LDraw relatively easily. Steve [1] May be a mis-use of the term -- not sure of the limits on tessalations. (26 years ago, 1-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Soccer ball name
|
|
(...) Yes, but you didn't have a LEGO set for your team. :-P Unless those unconfirmed rumors were true. Nah, Matt would have had some by now... Steve (26 years ago, 1-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: DAT voting page up
|
|
(...) In this case, all the tile elements probably have new, 5-digit part numbers. It would be appropriate to use these numbers for new versions of the tile. In general, if TLG modifies a part but retains the original part number, appending a letter (...) (26 years ago, 1-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Java LDraw/LDLite
|
|
(...) An online database isn't going to completely address your two issues -- missing parts and parts which haven't been created. Typically, parts will be missing from a model either because (a) the parts aren't made yet (and it's actually problem (...) (26 years ago, 1-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: parts wanted
|
|
(...) Well, as I said, there's a draft at (URL) specifically, here's the DAT-file, and a GIF image (2 URLs) not finished, but I may or may not finish it in some time. Also, I'm not too sure that I have used the best orientation. The orientation of (...) (26 years ago, 1-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: parts wanted
|
|
i do not have 8880. i d/led the instructions from kl.net. also fredric can you please make the dk grey offset crank? a placeholder would do but i realy want this part. (26 years ago, 1-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Where is the Parts Tracker?
|
|
(...) Maybe you could add an option to move a part from the request list to the parts tracker. When someone starts to work on a part from the request list instead of adding a new entry, the person would just modify the existing entry and the script (...) (26 years ago, 1-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: parts wanted
|
|
(...) This is already done: "6540.DAT Technic Steering Arm Large" Note that the version drawn has a cross axle hole, while your 8880 may have a normal Technic hole in this part. This part came in two versions, where the first one had the cross axle (...) (26 years ago, 1-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: parts wanted
|
|
(...) Yes, I'm working on those. But work progress is slow. I have drafts for 2852 Technic Connecting Rod 2853 Technic Crankshaft 2854 Technic Crankshaft Centre at the website (URL) planning to finish off these by some time, but don't hold your (...) (26 years ago, 1-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | VOTING now working
|
|
Hey all, Thanks to Todd "what would we do without him?" Lehman, the parts vote is back up and running. :-) (URL) to be safe, you should Refresh/Reload on your browser to make sure you don't use a cached copy of the voting page. If you think you have (...) (26 years ago, 1-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Where is the Parts Tracker?
|
|
(...) get (...) find (...) I (...) completed, (...) update a (...) Oh I see your point now. No, I don't think there is a way to do this. I vaguely recall Zachary pointing this out when he first put the "Requested Parts Page" up. I agree this would (...) (26 years ago, 1-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: parts wanted
|
|
(...) 6542.dat? is that the one you mean? (...) Hopefully, Onyx will get these done. (...) I believe those are on the way. By Fredrik. He just submitted the Technic round piston, and is working on the other engine parts. -- Terry K -- (26 years ago, 1-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | parts wanted
|
|
does anyone have the folowing parts? 8880 supercar blue suspension arms 8880 supercar gear shift center pieces 8880 supercar gear shift dk grey gears 8880 supercar white suspension arms 8880 supercar gear stick and shift plate large shock absorbers (...) (26 years ago, 1-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Where is the Parts Tracker?
|
|
(...) OK, well, I know how to update a part on the Parts Tracker Page, but I can't find any way to remove a part from the "Requested Parts" Page. I'm asking because I would be happy to clean up the parts that I requested that have been completed, (...) (26 years ago, 1-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Where is the Parts Tracker?
|
|
(...) have (...) There is no automation - it is the author's responsibility to move a part to completed when it's submitted, and remove it when the update is released. Chris Dee (26 years ago, 28-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Soccer ball name
|
|
(...) I only get the one copy -- the one you e-mail to me (assuming it makes it to me OK, which is highly probable but not guaranteed). I also see a copy of the article you posted when I read via NNTP. If I were reading lugnet.cad.dev via e-mail (...) (26 years ago, 28-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Where is the Parts Tracker?
|
|
(...) Thanks! I couldn't find it. Anyway, when does the requested parts list get updated? Isn't it supposed to automatically update "requested" parts that have been completed? --Karim (26 years ago, 28-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Java LDraw/LDLite
|
|
If I use Java 2 I can use the latest API's with it. Because of the Java plugin that Sun produces, a browser can have that installed and always have the most up to date Java implementation. This is especially important since Netscape is no longer (...) (26 years ago, 28-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: DAT voting page up
|
|
I've never authored lego parts for ldraw, but I did for pov-ray (at the time I was using Anton Raves library which is very good (a lot more detailed than ldraw, I haven't tried l3P so I don't know the quality of the output) but it was lacking some (...) (26 years ago, 28-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Soccer ball name
|
|
let's just say that in France nothing comes to mind when you say soccer, it doesn't come close to any name which we use. I'm ready to bet that it is the same in Brazil (BTW we won the world cup :-P ) Todd Lehman a écrit dans le message ... (...) (...) (26 years ago, 28-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Soccer ball pattern
|
|
(...) Well with at least one different the Aussi rules football is WAY more violent than rugby, more like american football (26 years ago, 28-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Java LDraw/LDLite
|
|
Actually the 3D api is released, it works great and is fairly easy to use, I recomand it as far as parsing there are several parser generators for java out there. and the 3D api is hardware accelerated (it is written on top of opengl) Sproaticus a (...) (26 years ago, 28-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
