| |
You could always "accidentally" stick a MegaBlock plate back there. It
would be obscured from view and I don't think they have markings on the
studs, but maybe they do. (I don't use MB, so I wouldn't know). I know
Tyco had blank studs, but their plates were thicker.
Mike
Karim <knassar@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:FrF0ss.Bnt@lugnet.com...
> In lugnet.trains, Frank Filz writes:
> > Karim wrote:
> > >
> > > Oooh, Drat! I forgot about the "lego" logos extruded on the tops of the
> > > studs... Oh well, just goes to show the dangers of designing lego • models in
> > > your head... :)
>
> > It's more than just the letters, the actual stud is ever so slightly
> > taller. When I gently slid a plate into a chanel made by reversing two
> > thin walls, the top of the stud caught the edge of the wall. The two
> > stud wide channel with 3 plates + tile did not exhibit this same
> > resistance.
>
>
> Hmmm, we may be running into the limit of lego tolerances here. When I • tried
> the assembly, it was clearly just the letters on top of the studs that • kept it
> from working perfectly. In fact, it does actually hold together, and • works
> just as I expected, but with a slight buldge one way or the other. This • buldge
> has the unfortunate effect of rocking the 1x2x1 panel back slightly, so • that it
> is not held firmly by the studs that are trying to hold it in place.
>
> You might try several different sets of 2420 (the "2x2 plate without • corner")
> to find a pair that will hold.
>
> --Karim
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Containers
|
| (...) Hmmm, we may be running into the limit of lego tolerances here. When I tried the assembly, it was clearly just the letters on top of the studs that kept it from working perfectly. In fact, it does actually hold together, and works just as I (...) (25 years ago, 14-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.build)
|
41 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
