Subject:
|
Re: Containers
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains, lugnet.build
|
Date:
|
Tue, 14 Mar 2000 04:15:44 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
[lpieniazek@novera.]nomorespam[com]
|
Viewed:
|
2175 times
|
| |
|
|
Kela Akira Kitkowski wrote:
>
> By chance, was the starting point of the "known" Lego Double-Stacks?
This sentence didn't parse for me. But I surmise that I agree. 4549 and
other 4 wide containers set the standard that I work from
> I'm
> inclined to believe that the starting point for this is 4549 Road 'N Rail
> Hauler. I found a set with the viechles and the figures gone, and all that's
> left is 1 of the small containers and the car itself.
>
> And don't buy CSX yet....they still need to iron out the Post-Conrail
> jitters.
It's just mad money, maybe a grand or two... so I don't have to time the
bottom exactly.
So who wants to lay odds on whether it's BN-CN-CSX and UP-CP-NS or
BN-CN-NS and UP-CP-CSX ?
UP and CSX are a better fit, more arrogant and less competent upper
management than BN and NS. NS is quiet but gets it done.... IMHO
--
Larry Pieniazek - lpieniazek@mercator.com - http://my.voyager.net/lar
http://www.mercator.com. Mercator, the e-business transformation company
fund Lugnet(tm): http://www.ebates.com/ ref: lar, 1/2 $$ to lugnet.
Note: this is a family forum!
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Containers
|
| By chance, was the starting point of the "known" Lego Double-Stacks? I'm inclined to believe that the starting point for this is 4549 Road 'N Rail Hauler. I found a set with the viechles and the figures gone, and all that's left is 1 of the small (...) (25 years ago, 14-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.build)
|
41 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
