Subject:
|
Re: LEGO Ambassadors Status Report - Summer 2007
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.ambassadors
|
Date:
|
Tue, 31 Jul 2007 18:01:20 GMT
|
Highlighted:
|
!
(details)
|
Viewed:
|
12142 times
|
| |
|
|
Its certainly not a bad thing for you to mention Nathan’s involvement as he was
very valuable to that project. Also speaking about your role isn’t a bad thing
either, here’s the reason why there’s usually some hesitation when it comes to
working on internal projects:
When people ask if they can speak about the projects they are involved in a lot
of times we have to give the permission with the notice that they not give away
too much internal stuff. its just the nature of anyone who might have been
involved to want to ‘tell all’, but there’s several things on the development
process that just can’t get out. I’d tell you what those things are, but that
would just be silly on my part I think.
You’re not making bad points Allister, One thing I’d really like to point out
about the Ambassador program and all of the the programs is that they’re still
very much in development. Expecting them to be the perfect balance right now is
just as ridiculous as us at LEGO assuming we’ve done a bang up job on it and it
doesn’t need fixing. Part of the process is learning where its place is and how
it fits into the larger community and how it can serve that community best.
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: LEGO Ambassadors Status Report - Summer 2007
|
| (...) They may be very active 'in their communities' posting regularly to one forum isn't exactly fitting your definition of 'wide' access. (...) I did mention one notable exception, did I not? (...) Not everyone can make it to Brickfest. Maybe the (...) (17 years ago, 27-Jul-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
|
38 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
