Subject:
|
Re: LEGO Ambassadors Status Report - Summer 2007
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.ambassadors
|
Date:
|
Sun, 29 Jul 2007 21:28:05 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
10377 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.ambassadors, Leonard Hoffman wrote:
| |
Big part of the secrecy issue is actually figuring out what must be kept
secret and what doesn’t have to. Before the Ambassadors, TLG kept everything
underwraps except what they needed to for marketting purposes. The idea of
the Ambassadors meant that some information could be given out. So how do we
figure that out? Information given on the Ambassador list could be okay or
it could be not okay (to announce). The answer is often “I’m not sure, let
me check.” So the Ambassadors ask Steve, and Steve asks his boss, and his
boss askes whoever the information relates to and that person may or may not
answer in a timely manner.
|
Then it sounds to me like this is an area that Steve and the Ambassadors need to
work on.
If I were LEGO, what I would do is whenever information is being shared with the
Ambassadors, I would include along with that information some indication of “how
secret” it is, and when it can be made public. This way there wouldn’t be this
uncertainty about secrecy.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: LEGO Ambassadors Status Report - Summer 2007
|
| (...) Let me say that I understand your sentiment and your frustration. My aim here is to outline some of the issues that make it difficult to do what seems obvious. Big part of the secrecy issue is actually figuring out what must be kept secret and (...) (17 years ago, 26-Jul-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
|
38 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
