| |
In lugnet.people, Tom Inosanto writes:
> **Note** I have censored Jesse's post with "@@@"'s to cover the offensive
> words..
>
> In lugnet.people, Jesse Alan Long writes:
> <snip>
> > A good example is that I never started a sentence with, "You sorry son of a
> > b@@@@, go@@@@@, mother fu@@@@@ a@@@@@e!" That sort of sentence is
> > incredibly rude and also it is not my typical sort of behavior on Lugnet.
>
> As well is NOT ALLOWED on Lugnet, this is uncaled fo at any response, and I
> am offended that you choose to have your war on these boards. See below...
I decided to let that slide in the context it was said...but you are
correct, Tom.
<snip>
> Jessie, Matt and whoever is dragging this out - Keep in mind you are on a
> public board - you really need to take this war to private e-mail. Tim had
> the right idea about mailing you, Tim undersatnds this stuff does not belong
> on these boards. I, as I would assume others are tired of reading this war,
> so I ask you to take it to email, where it belongs! You should be banned for
> using the language you have decided to use, as it is a direct violation of
> the TOS here on Lugnet. Ad if you have any quams, email me!
E-mail, too, has failed...sadly. I've been privvy to some of the mail, and
it hasn't worked any better than words here.
But Tom, this IS a public board, and only Jesse has chosen to respond to
this particular thread in these ways. The rest is acceptable, especially in
.people. This isn't (well, WASN'T) a flame war. It was never intended to be
(and I said so previously, to Geordan).
My failing here is that I have allowed myself to be goaded into trying to
keep some lines of communication open on this subject...that's completely my
fault...but what I have written seems to have fallen on deaf ears...as have
the words of everyone else. That's too bad...there have been some good,
salient points made. Oh well...
Matt
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Apology for Jesse Long
|
| (...) Why argue any more online? Does any person on Lugnet even KNOW exactly what started this arguement? I think that constructive criticism (which I have been trying to do very strongly to most people online) should be allowed on Lugnet. I believe (...) (23 years ago, 5-Aug-01, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.terms)
| | | Re: Apology for Jesse Long
|
| "Matthew Gerber" <matthew@digitaliris.com> wrote in message news:GHLwqD.HsH@lugnet.com... (...) offensive (...) son of a (...) Lugnet. (...) response, and I (...) below... (...) <snip> I do not care what context it was in, I just had my 9 year old (...) (23 years ago, 5-Aug-01, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Apology for Jesse Long
|
| **Note** I have censored Jesse's post with "@@@"'s to cover the offensive words.. In lugnet.people, Jesse Alan Long writes: <snip> (...) As well is NOT ALLOWED on Lugnet, this is uncaled fo at any response, and I am offended that you choose to have (...) (23 years ago, 5-Aug-01, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
26 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
